These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Automated laser registration in image-guided surgery: evaluation of the correlation between laser scan resolution and navigation accuracy. Marmulla R; Lüth T; Mühling J; Hassfeld S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Oct; 33(7):642-8. PubMed ID: 15337176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simulator for maxillofacial surgery integrating 3D cephalometry and orthodontia. Bettega G; Payan Y; Mollard B; Boyer A; Raphaël B; Lavallée S Comput Aided Surg; 2000; 5(3):156-65. PubMed ID: 10964087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Augmented reality during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: toward real-time 3D-CT to stereoscopic video registration. Su LM; Vagvolgyi BP; Agarwal R; Reiley CE; Taylor RH; Hager GD Urology; 2009 Apr; 73(4):896-900. PubMed ID: 19193404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new navigation system based on cephalograms and dental casts for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Tsuji M; Noguchi N; Shigematsu M; Yamashita Y; Ihara K; Shikimori M; Goto M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):828-36. PubMed ID: 16690251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production. Widmann G; Widmann R; Widmann E; Jaschke W; Bale R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 17340899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Markerless patient registration. A new technique for image-guided surgery of the lateral base of the skull]. Marmulla R; Mühling J; Eggers G; Hassfeld S HNO; 2005 Feb; 53(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 15221084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison between computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning for capturing 3-dimensional data from an object of standard form. Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):405-13. PubMed ID: 16220806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Luebbers HT; Messmer P; Obwegeser JA; Zwahlen RA; Kikinis R; Graetz KW; Matthews F J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 36(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 18280173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increase of accuracy in intraoperative navigation through high-resolution flat-panel volume computed tomography: experimental comparison with multislice computed tomography-based navigation. Bartling SH; Leinung M; Graute J; Rodt T; Dullin C; Becker H; Lenarz T; Stover T; Majdani O Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 17195752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning for capturing 3-dimensional data from a natural ear to aid rehabilitation. Coward TJ; Scott BJ; Watson RM; Richards R Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 16479767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]