These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15546015)

  • 1. Digital treatment objectives: procedure and clinical application.
    Garino F; Garino GB
    Prog Orthod; 2004; 5(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 15546015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided interactive indirect bonding.
    Garino F; Garino GB
    Prog Orthod; 2005; 6(2):214-23. PubMed ID: 16276430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models.
    Whetten JL; Williamson PC; Heo G; Varnhagen C; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 17045148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual study models: a comparison of modular application systems.
    Favero L; Terrazzani C; Favero V; Stellini E; Cocilovo F
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):16-25. PubMed ID: 20545088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models].
    Jedlińska A
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR; Dolce C; McGorray SP; Le H; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D morphological assessment of occlusal treatment by measuring dental casts with a micro-focus X-ray CT.
    Kamegawa M; Nakamura M; Kitahara K; Ohtomo H; Hasegawa T; Nakakura T; Tsutsumi S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 May; 35(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 18405275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs.
    Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; van Vlijmen OJ; Plooij JM; Schutyser F; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):820-6. PubMed ID: 19061810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of virtual reality and stereolithographic models in maxillo-facial surgical planning.
    Robiony M; Salvo I; Costa F; Zerman N; Bandera C; Filippi S; Felice M; Politi M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):482-9. PubMed ID: 18362729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A system for the simulation and planning of orthodontic treatment using a low cost 3D laser scanner for dental anatomy capturing.
    Alcañiz M; Grau V; Monserrat C; Juan C; Albalat S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():8-14. PubMed ID: 10538404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 3-Dimensional Facial Morpho-Dynamic Database in the development of a prediction model in orthognathic surgery.
    Peretta R; Concheri G; Comelli D; Meneghello R; Galzignato PF; Ferronato G
    Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):8-19. PubMed ID: 19350055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of dental arch forms between Class II Division 1 and normal occlusion assessed by euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Nie Q; Lin J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 16627179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-time orthognathic surgical simulation using a mandibular motion tracking system.
    Fushima K; Kobayashi M; Konishi H; Minagichi K; Fukuchi T
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Mar; 12(2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17487659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models.
    Veenema AC; Katsaros C; Boxum SC; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 19329650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A virtual interface for interactions with 3D models of the human body.
    De Paolis LT; Pulimeno M; Aloisio G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():68-70. PubMed ID: 19377116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.