157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15547065)
21. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of test reliability on the screening performance of frequency-doubling perimetry.
Heeg GP; Jansonius NM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):585-7. PubMed ID: 16490521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Population norms for frequency doubling perimetry with uncorrected refractive error.
Ramesh SV; George R; Soni PM; Palaniappan L; Raju P; Paul PG; Ramsathish S; Vijaya L
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 84(6):496-504. PubMed ID: 17568319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Community visual field screening: prevalence of follow-up and factors associated with follow-up of participants with abnormal frequency doubling perimetry technology results.
Mansberger SL; Edmunds B; Johnson CA; Kent KJ; Cioffi GA
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(3):134-40. PubMed ID: 17613848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in an urban south Indian population and comparison with a rural population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study.
Vijaya L; George R; Baskaran M; Arvind H; Raju P; Ramesh SV; Kumaramanickavel G; McCarty C
Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):648-654.e1. PubMed ID: 17664010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term fluctuation of standard automatic perimetry, pulsar perimetry and frequency-doubling technology in early glaucoma diagnosis.
Gonzalez-Hernandez M; de la Rosa MG; de la Vega RR; Hernandez-Vidal A
Ophthalmic Res; 2007; 39(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 17952009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.
North RV; Jones AL; Hunter E; Morgan JE; Wild JM
Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Refractive errors of medical students in Turkey: one year follow-up of refraction and biometry.
Onal S; Toker E; Akingol Z; Arslan G; Ertan S; Turan C; Kaplan O
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 17435530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of decision rules for frequency-doubling technology screening tests.
Gardiner SK; Anderson DR; Fingeret M; McSoley JJ; Johnson CA
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):432-7. PubMed ID: 16840859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Repeatability of frequency doubling technology perimetry (20-1 screening program) and the effect of pupillary dilatation on interpretation.
Parikh R; Muliyil J; George R; Bhat S; Thomas R
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18300088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal children.
Quinn LM; Gardiner SK; Wheeler DT; Newkirk M; Johnson CA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 17046702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Symptoms related to glaucomatous visual field abnormalities among male Japanese workers in a population-based setting.
Tatemichi M; Nakano T; Hayashi T; Tanaka K; Hiro H; Miyamoto T; Aratake M; Nishinoue N; Yamazaki A; Nakadate T; Sugita M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 90(6):546-51. PubMed ID: 20809905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of combined GDx-VCC and matrix FDT in a glaucoma screening trial.
Tóth M; Kóthy P; Vargha P; Holló G
J Glaucoma; 2007 Aug; 16(5):462-70. PubMed ID: 17700289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prevalence of refractive errors in a Brazilian population: the Botucatu eye study.
Schellini SA; Durkin SR; Hoyama E; Hirai F; Cordeiro R; Casson RJ; Selva D; Padovani CR
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009; 16(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19353397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Correlation between hemifield visual field damage and corresponding parapapillary atrophy in normal-tension glaucoma.
Kawano J; Tomidokoro A; Mayama C; Kunimatsu S; Tomita G; Araie M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 16815249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Meta-analysis of diagnostic capability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) for primary glaucoma].
Liu T; He XG
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 May; 42(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 16762233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
