117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15547233)
1. Contrast-enhanced high-resolution MRI of invasive breast cancer: correlation with histopathologic subtypes.
Kitagawa K; Sakuma H; Ishida N; Hirano T; Ishihara A; Takeda K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1805-9. PubMed ID: 15547233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging parameters and histological types of invasive ductal carcinoma of breast.
Takeda Y; Yoshikawa K
Biomed Pharmacother; 2005 Apr; 59(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 15795104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two different types of ring-like enhancement on dynamic MR imaging in breast cancer: correlation with the histopathologic findings.
Kobayashi M; Kawashima H; Matsui O; Zen Y; Suzuki M; Inokuchi M; Noguchi M; Ohta T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 28(6):1435-43. PubMed ID: 19025952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency, upgrade rates, and characteristics of high-risk lesions initially identified with breast MRI.
Strigel RM; Eby PR; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20729462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between numeric gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI ratios and prognostic factors and histologic type of breast carcinoma.
Narisada H; Aoki T; Sasaguri T; Hashimoto H; Konishi T; Morita M; Korogi Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 16861530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Invasive breast carcinoma: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging enhancement features and cell proliferative activity determined by DNA S-phase percentage.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Budnick RM; Stewart CC
Cancer; 1996 May; 77(9):1844-9. PubMed ID: 8646683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?
Hahn SY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hwang JY; Nam M
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 23588154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 20657229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors.
Matsubayashi R; Matsuo Y; Edakuni G; Satoh T; Tokunaga O; Kudo S
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):841-8. PubMed ID: 11110952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: MRI findings.
Jeong SJ; Lim HS; Lee JS; Park MH; Yoon JH; Park JG; Kang HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):W482-7. PubMed ID: 22528930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Fat suppressed dynamic MR imaging of breast cancer: radiologic-pathologic correlation].
Kawashima H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jun; 56(7):459-69. PubMed ID: 8692661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peripheral hyperintense pattern on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast carcinoma: correlation with early peripheral enhancement on dynamic MRI and histopathologic findings.
Kawashima H; Kobayashi-Yoshida M; Matsui O; Zen Y; Suzuki M; Inokuchi M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Nov; 32(5):1117-23. PubMed ID: 21031517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.
Huang YT; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Kuo WL; Chen SC
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21969708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of medullary carcinoma of the breast.
Tominaga J; Hama H; Kimura N; Takahashi S
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):525-9. PubMed ID: 18353587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1223-30. PubMed ID: 22528918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A wide variety of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR appearances of breast cancer: pathologic correlation study.
Onishi M; Furukawa A; Takahashi M; Murata K
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 17683886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]