297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15547412)
1. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in tympanoplasty after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children.
Anderson J; Cayé-Thomasen P; Tos M
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):856-63. PubMed ID: 15547412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ten-year results of cartilage palisades versus fascia in eardrum reconstruction after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children.
Cayé-Thomasen P; Andersen J; Uzun C; Hansen S; Tos M
Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):944-52. PubMed ID: 19358204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eustachian tube patency and function in tympanoplasty with cartilage palisades or fascia after cholesteatoma surgery.
Uzun C; Cayé-Thomasen P; Andersen J; Tos M
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):864-72. PubMed ID: 15547413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty in sinus and tensa retraction cholesteatoma.
Andersen J; Cayé-Thomasen P; Tos M
Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):825-31. PubMed ID: 12438840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A tympanometric comparison of tympanoplasty with cartilage palisades or fascia after surgery for tensa cholesteatoma in children.
Uzun C; Cayé-Thomasen P; Andersen J; Tos M
Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1751-7. PubMed ID: 14520101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cartilage palisades in type III tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional long-term results.
Bernal-Sprekelsen M; Romaguera Lliso MD; Sanz Gonzalo JJ
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 12544026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pars tensa retractions without cholesteatoma in children: predictors for ossicular chain destruction, air conduction thresholds, and postoperative retractions.
Jesic SD; Rovcanin LH; Jovicevic OD; Jotic AD; Slijepcevic NA; Ljubic VR
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jul; 35(6):997-1002. PubMed ID: 24662635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results.
Ozbek C; Ciftçi O; Tuna EE; Yazkan O; Ozdem C
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):679-83. PubMed ID: 18580702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty.
Demirpehlivan IA; Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Songu M; Ciger E; Can N
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 268(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 21267588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in a 1,000-patient series.
Dornhoffer J
Laryngoscope; 2003 Nov; 113(11):1844-56. PubMed ID: 14603038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique.
Kazikdas KC; Onal K; Boyraz I; Karabulut E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 264(9):985-9. PubMed ID: 17401572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ring versus 'Mercedes-Benz' cartilage-perichondrium graft tympanoplasty in management of pars tensa cholesteatoma.
Albirmawy OA
J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Dec; 125(12):1232-8. PubMed ID: 22017771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined Heermann and Tos (CHAT) technique in cholesteatoma surgery: surgical technique and preliminary results.
Uzun C; Yagiz R; Tas A; Adali MK; Koten M; Karasalihoglu AR
J Laryngol Otol; 2005 Jun; 119(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 15992467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of hearing levels and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques: preliminary results].
Solmaz MA; Yücel EA; Ozdemir M; Güldiken Y; Değer K
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2002; 9(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12422082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty: otological and audiological results.
Uslu C; Tek A; Tatlipinar A; Kiliçarslan Y; Durmuş R; Ayöğredik E; Karaman M; Oysu C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 130(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 20151874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in children.
Couloigner V; Baculard F; El Bakkouri W; Viala P; François M; Narcy P; Van Den Abbeele T
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Mar; 26(2):247-51. PubMed ID: 15793413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The button graft technique for perforations affecting less than 25% of the tympanic membrane: a non-randomised comparison of a new modification to cartilage tympanoplasty with underlay and overlay grafts.
Abdelghany AM
Clin Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 38(3):208-16. PubMed ID: 23745532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Type III tympanoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis: anatomic and functional results.
Iñiguez-Cuadra R; Alobid I; Borés-Domenech A; Menéndez-Colino LM; Caballero-Borrego M; Bernal-Sprekelsen M
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):409-14. PubMed ID: 20042992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cartilage tympanoplasty: postoperative functional results.
Page C; Charlet L; Strunski V
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1195-8. PubMed ID: 18305950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Cartilage Palisades and Temporal Fascia in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Bilateral Tympanic Membrane Perforations in Children.
Gün T; Boztepe OF; Atan D; İkincioğulları A; Dere H
J Int Adv Otol; 2017 Apr; 13(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 27879224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
