These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1554759)

  • 1. Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems.
    Gray JE
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Feb; 5(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 1554759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays.
    Groth DS; Bernatz SN; Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(3):719-32. PubMed ID: 11353118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
    Ly CK
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras.
    Gray JE; Lisk KG; Haddick DH; Harshbarger JH; Oosterhof A; Schwenker R
    Radiology; 1985 Feb; 154(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 3966138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality control of cathode-ray tube monitors for medical imaging using a simple photometer.
    Parsons DM; Kim Y; Haynor DR
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 7734525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of PACS display systems.
    Aldrich JE; Rutledge JD
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 16094505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality control of a laser camera with the SMPTE test pattern: optical density variations with printing format and frame position.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Tsapaki V; Koulentianos E; Triantopoulou C
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jan; 77(913):52-6. PubMed ID: 14988139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A practical approach to soft-copy display consistency for PC-based review workstations.
    Jervis SE; Brettle DS
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 76(909):648-52. PubMed ID: 14500280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of color CRT display systems for monochrome applications.
    Spekowius G
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Aug; 12(3):102-13. PubMed ID: 10461573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three monochrome displays from a single, true color video display controller.
    Raff U; Spitzer VM
    J Digit Imaging; 1991 Feb; 4(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 2029570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices.
    Wang J; Anderson J; Lane T; Stetson C; Moore J
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):162-7. PubMed ID: 10847389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field.
    Roehrig H; Willis CE; Damento MA
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Nov; 12(4):152-65. PubMed ID: 10587910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of monitor conditions for the display of radiological diagnostic images and ambient lighting.
    Wade C; Brennan PC
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):465-71. PubMed ID: 15151966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.
    Geijer H; Geijer M; Forsberg L; Kheddache S; Sund P
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 17340227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of film, hard copy computed radiography (CR) and soft copy picture archiving and communication (PACS) systems using a contrast detail test object.
    Weatherburn GC; Davies JG
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Sep; 72(861):856-63. PubMed ID: 10645191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency and impact of high-resolution monitor failure in a filmless imaging department.
    Siegel EL; Reiner BI; Cadogan M
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Aug; 13(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 15359749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and evaluation of a new gray-scale test pattern to adjust gradients of thoracic CT imaging.
    Yamaguchi M; Fujita H; Uemura M; Asai Y; Wakae H; Ishifuro M
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Dec; 14(12):2357-61. PubMed ID: 15060840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An interactive method of assessing the characteristics of softcopy display using observer performance tests.
    Wang J; Peng Q
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():216-8. PubMed ID: 12105732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative evaluation of low-cost frame-grabber boards for personal computers.
    Kofler JM; Gray JE; Fuelberth JT; Taubel JP
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Nov; 8(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 8573628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.