These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15548392)

  • 21. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Swift BE; Shah PS; Farine D
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):830-841. PubMed ID: 30779345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting Uterine Rupture Risk Using Lower Uterine Segment Measurement During Pregnancy With Cesarean History: How Reliable Is It? A Review.
    McLeish SF; Murchison AB; Smith DM; Ghahremani T; Johnson IM; Magann EF
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2023 May; 78(5):302-308. PubMed ID: 37263964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Thickness of the lower uterine segment: its influence in the management of patients with previous cesarean sections.
    Rozenberg P; Goffinet F; Philippe HJ; Nisand I
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1999 Nov; 87(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 10579615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus.
    Rozenberg P; Goffinet F; Phillippe HJ; Nisand I
    Lancet; 1996 Feb; 347(8997):281-4. PubMed ID: 8569360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar.
    Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 28233347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography.
    Naji O; Wynants L; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23371440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of labor at prior cesarean on lower uterine segment thickness in subsequent pregnancy.
    Jastrow N; Gauthier RJ; Gagnon G; Leroux N; Beaudoin F; Bujold E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):563.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20042176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Utility of multiparametric MRI in Caesarean section scar characterization and preoperative prediction of scar dehiscence: a prospective study.
    Kumar I; Verma A; Matah M; Satpathy G
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Jul; 58(7):890-896. PubMed ID: 27799572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section and next birth.
    Basic E; Basic-Cetkovic V; Kozaric H; Rama A
    Med Arch; 2012; 66(3 Suppl 1):41-4. PubMed ID: 22937691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor.
    Hendler I; Bujold E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 104(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 15291999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Second-trimester sonographic comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without a previous cesarean delivery.
    Sambaziotis H; Conway C; Figueroa R; Elimian A; Garry D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Jul; 23(7):907-11; quiz 913-4. PubMed ID: 15292558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Technique of sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment in women with previous cesarean delivery: a prospective, pre/intraoperative comparative ultrasound study.
    Seliger G; Chaoui K; Lautenschläger C; Riemer M; Tchirikov M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Aug; 298(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 29948165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
    Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inter- and intraobserver variability in sonographic measurement of the lower uterine segment after a previous Cesarean section.
    Jastrow N; Antonelli E; Robyr R; Irion O; Boulvain M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):420-4. PubMed ID: 16526096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validity Of Transabdominal Ultrasound Scan In The Prediction Of Uterine Scar Thickness.
    Sarwar I; Akram F; Khan A; Malik S; Islam A; Khan K
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2020; 32(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 32468759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prospective observational study of trial of labor after cesarean in rural India.
    Soni A; Sharma C; Verma S; Justa U; Soni PK; Verma A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 May; 129(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 25801195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ultrasound Predictability of Lower Uterine Segment Cesarean Section Scar Thickness.
    Tazion S; Hafeez M; Manzoor R; Rana T
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2018 May; 28(5):361-364. PubMed ID: 29690964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery.
    Cheung VY; Constantinescu OC; Ahluwalia BS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Nov; 23(11):1441-7. PubMed ID: 15498908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Delivery after previous cesarean section. Experience with 173 patients].
    Comerio D; Crescini C; Idi G; Artuso A; Morganti P; Repetti F
    Minerva Ginecol; 1991 Nov; 43(11):513-8. PubMed ID: 1784408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Does Lower Uterine Segment Thickness Measurement Improve Birth Planning After Previous Cesarean Section?].
    Schmitz J; Stepan H; Schrey-Petersen S; Hoffmann J
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2019 Dec; 223(6):350-358. PubMed ID: 31163458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.