These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15549015)

  • 1. Not for resuscitation instructions: the law for children in the UK.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Sep 23-Oct 13; 13(17):1033-4. PubMed ID: 15549015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ECHR 2004/9 Case of Glass v. The United Kingdom, 9 March 2004, no. 61827/00 (fourth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2004 Jun; 11(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 15387430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital breached boy's human rights by treating him against his mother's wishes.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2004 Mar; 328(7441):661. PubMed ID: 15031222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Withdrawal of life sustaining treatment for child without parental consent. R. v. Portsmouth Hospitals N.H.S. Trust ex parte Glass.
    Fennell P
    Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 11787503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efforts should be made to find boy with cancer after his removal from hospital, UK court orders.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5431. PubMed ID: 26459367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not for resuscitation instructions: the law for adult patients in the UK.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Sep 9-22; 13(16):984-6. PubMed ID: 15389142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In the Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia.
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 1563941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glass v United Kingdom and Burke v General Medical Council. Judicial interpretations of European Convention Rights for patients in the United Kingdom facing decisions about life-sustaining treatment limitations.
    Woodcock T; Wheeler R
    Intensive Care Med; 2005 Jun; 31(6):885. PubMed ID: 15856173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. UK doctors breached patient's human rights, court rules.
    Rogers A
    Lancet; 2004 Mar; 363(9413):956. PubMed ID: 15046119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. R.R. v. M.H.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1998 Jan; 689():790-7. PubMed ID: 12041242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When is a non-resuscitation policy lawful?
    Stone J
    Solicit J; 1996 Mar; 140(12):314. PubMed ID: 14626241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Court permits doctors not to resuscitate gravely handicapped infant.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():22-3. PubMed ID: 11651089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Care and Protection of Beth.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Hampden
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1992 Mar; 587():1377-83. PubMed ID: 12041221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Theoretical and generic considerations for hospital life-sustaining treatment policies.
    Silfen E
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 10140178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. District nurse responsibilities in relation to 'do not attempt resuscitation' decisions.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2014 Jul; 19(7):357-9. PubMed ID: 25039346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Donaldson v. Van de Kamp: cryonics, assisted suicide, and the challenges of medical science.
    Pommer RW
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():589-603. PubMed ID: 10183890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re F (in Utero).
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1988 Feb; [1988]2():193-201. PubMed ID: 11648578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The implications of the David Glass case for future clinical practice in the UK.
    Elias-Jones AC; Samanta J
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):822-5. PubMed ID: 16040880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Courts to look again at assisted dying law.
    Griffith R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2017 May; 22(5):252-254. PubMed ID: 28467248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.