These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15549384)

  • 1. Technical variability and required sample size of helminth egg isolation procedures: revisited.
    Morrison DA
    Parasitol Res; 2004 Nov; 94(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 15549384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical variability and required sample size of helminth egg isolation procedures.
    Mes TH
    Vet Parasitol; 2003 Aug; 115(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 12944044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a composite method for counting helminth eggs in cattle faeces.
    Ward MP; Lyndal-Murphy M; Baldock FC
    Vet Parasitol; 1997 Dec; 73(1-2):181-7. PubMed ID: 9477505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The comparison of FLOTAC, FECPAK and McMaster techniques for nematode egg counts in cattle.
    Bosco A; Rinaldi L; Maurelli MP; Musella V; Coles GC; Cringoli G
    Acta Parasitol; 2014 Oct; 59(4):625-8. PubMed ID: 25236271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Helminths identified by coprological examination in cattle raised in Bartin region].
    Kozan E
    Turkiye Parazitol Derg; 2014; 38(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 24659696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Helminth parasitism study of cattle in mangrove pastures in Guadeloupe. I. Animal parasitism and meadow infestation].
    Mauleon H; Gruner L
    Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop; 1982; 35(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 7186175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of helminths in ruminants at necropsy.
    Reinecke RK
    J S Afr Vet Assoc; 1984 Sep; 55(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 6492069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bias, accuracy and precision of faecal egg count reduction test results in cattle using McMaster, Cornell-Wisconsin and FLOTAC egg counting methods.
    Levecke B; Rinaldi L; Charlier J; Maurelli MP; Bosco A; Vercruysse J; Cringoli G
    Vet Parasitol; 2012 Aug; 188(1-2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22503038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing storage methods of faecal samples for subsequent measurement of helminth egg numbers in the domestic horse.
    Crawley JA; Chapman SN; Lummaa V; Lynsdale CL
    Vet Parasitol; 2016 May; 221():130-3. PubMed ID: 27084484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coprophagy in dogs interferes in the diagnosis of parasitic infections by faecal examination.
    Nijsse R; Mughini-Gras L; Wagenaar JA; Ploeger HW
    Vet Parasitol; 2014 Aug; 204(3-4):304-9. PubMed ID: 24880647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying the sources of variability in equine faecal egg counts: implications for improving the utility of the method.
    Denwood MJ; Love S; Innocent GT; Matthews L; McKendrick IJ; Hillary N; Smith A; Reid SW
    Vet Parasitol; 2012 Aug; 188(1-2):120-6. PubMed ID: 22469484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to make DNA count: DNA-based diagnostic tools in veterinary parasitology.
    Hunt PW; Lello J
    Vet Parasitol; 2012 May; 186(1-2):101-8. PubMed ID: 22169224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proficiency testing assessments for nematode worm egg counting based on Poisson variation.
    van Burgel AJ; Lyon J; Besier RB; Palmer DG
    Vet Parasitol; 2014 Sep; 205(1-2):385-8. PubMed ID: 25108852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coprological helminth screening in Brazilian free ranging golden lion tamarins, Leontopithecus rosalia (L., 1766) (Primates, Callithrichidae).
    Monteiro RV; Jansen AM; Pinto RM
    Braz J Biol; 2003 Nov; 63(4):727-9. PubMed ID: 15029386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of common fecal flotation techniques for the recovery of parasite eggs and oocysts.
    Dryden MW; Payne PA; Ridley R; Smith V
    Vet Ther; 2005; 6(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15906267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel method for the isolation of gastro-intestinal nematode eggs that allows automated analysis of digital images of egg preparations and high throughput screening.
    Mes TH; Ploeger HW; Terlou M; Kooyman FN; Van der Ploeg MP; Eysker M
    Parasitology; 2001 Sep; 123(Pt 3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11578095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numbers of gastrointestinal helminth eggs of Wyoming cattle in two surveys: 1957 to 1961 and 1973 to 1977.
    Werner BA; Bergstrom RC
    Am J Vet Res; 1983 Feb; 44(2):301-3. PubMed ID: 6830021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of anthelmintic resistance on two Irish beef research farms.
    O'Shaughnessy J; Earley B; Mee JF; Doherty ML; Crosson P; Barrett D; Prendiville R; Macrelli M; de Waal T
    Vet Rec; 2014 Aug; 175(5):120. PubMed ID: 24902778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the detection of anthelmintic resistance: evaluation of faecal egg count reduction test procedures suitable for farm routines.
    Calvete C; Uriarte J
    Vet Parasitol; 2013 Sep; 196(3-4):438-52. PubMed ID: 23537948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of a simplified faecal egg count reduction test for assessing anthelmintic efficacy on Belgian and German cattle farms.
    El-Abdellati A; Charlier J; Geldhof P; Levecke B; Demeler J; von Samson-Himmelstjerna G; Claerebout E; Vercruysse J
    Vet Parasitol; 2010 May; 169(3-4):352-7. PubMed ID: 20149547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.