141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15549692)
1. The FocalPoint System: FocalPoint slide profiler and FocalPoint GS.
Kardos TF
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 15549692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid prescreening is as effective at reducing screening error as postscreening with the FocalPoint automated screening device.
Wilgenbusch H; Mueller G; Neal M; Renshaw AA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Nov; 39(11):818-21. PubMed ID: 20949451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FocalPoint slide classification algorithms show robust performance in classification of high-grade lesions on SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology slides.
Parker EM; Foti JA; Wilbur DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 14755762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to take cervical smears.
Johnson W
Community Nurse; 1999 Jun; 5(5):27-30. PubMed ID: 10513548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening.
Bentz JS
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov; 5(6):857-71. PubMed ID: 16255628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. European guidelines on cervical screening.
Smith JH; Desai MS
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration of the Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS slide profiler is essential for optimal performance: Avoiding the algorithm supersaturation cascade effect pitfall.
Nuttall DS; Anderson WJ; Savage AJ; Denton K; Martin CM; O'Leary JJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2023 Jun; 131(6):383-391. PubMed ID: 36973942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automation in cervical cancer screening. Part 1: fixed cell scanning systems.
Husain OA; Tucker JH; Roberts BA
Biomed Eng; 1976 May; 11(5):161-6. PubMed ID: 945084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS Imaging System: clinical trials demonstrate significantly improved sensitivity for the detection of important cervical lesions.
Wilbur DC; Black-Schaffer WS; Luff RD; Abraham KP; Kemper C; Molina JT; Tench WD
Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Nov; 132(5):767-75. PubMed ID: 19846820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Public expectations, achievable cervical screening sensitivity, and the standard of practice.
Austin RM
Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12589638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening.
Renshaw AA
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Practice tips. Smear tactics: a more comfortable Papanicolaou test.
Tsang N; Osmun WE
Can Fam Physician; 2007 May; 53(5):835. PubMed ID: 17872746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Colposcopy, cervical screening, and HPV. Preface.
Waxman AG
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):xv-xvi. PubMed ID: 19061813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New cervical cancer screening techniques.
McNeeley SG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 189(4 Suppl):S40-1. PubMed ID: 14586319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality control in cervical cancer screening: Brazilian experience.
Collaço LM; de Noronha L; Bleggi-Torres LF; Pinheiro DL
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):694-6. PubMed ID: 16450916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can we change the way we screen?: the ThinPrep Imaging System.
Dawson AE
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 15540250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
Joste N
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
Arbyn M; Herbert A; Schenck U; Nieminen P; Jordan J; Mcgoogan E; Patnick J; Bergeron C; Baldauf JJ; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Martin-Hirsch P
Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automation of primary screening for cervical cancer. Sooner or later?
Bartels PH; Vooijs GP
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 9987443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Re: Liquid-based cytology for cervical screening.
Blamey S; Jackson T; Robinson J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Feb; 46(1):70-1; author reply 71-2. PubMed ID: 16441706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
