204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15550848)
1. Evaluation of dynamic studies of MR mammography for the diagnosis of intraductal lesions with nipple discharge.
Ishikawa T; Momiyama N; Hamaguchi Y; Takeuchi M; Iwasawa T; Yoshida T; Shimada H
Breast Cancer; 2004; 11(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 15550848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR ductography: comparison with conventional ductography as a diagnostic method in patients with nipple discharge.
Hirose M; Nobusawa H; Gokan T
Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S183-96. PubMed ID: 18180226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study.
Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; De Felice C; Meggiorini ML; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM
Radiol Med; 2008 Mar; 113(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 18386126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-volume fusion imaging of MR ductography and MR mammography for patients with nipple discharge.
Hirose M; Otsuki N; Hayano D; Shinjo H; Gokan T; Kashiwase T; Suzuki K; Sawada T
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2006 Jul; 5(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 17008767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective statistical analysis on the diagnostic value of ductography based on lesion pathology in patients presenting with nipple discharge.
Srinivasan A; Nia E; Gupta M; Sun J; Leung JW
Breast J; 2019 Jul; 25(4):585-589. PubMed ID: 31087380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ductoscopic detection of intraductal lesions in cases of pathologic nipple discharge in comparison with standard diagnostics: the German multicenter study.
Ohlinger R; Stomps A; Paepke S; Blohmer JU; Grunwald S; Hahndorf W; Camara O; Deichert U; Peisker U; Kohlmann T; Buchholz I; Hegenscheid K; Utpatel K; Zygmunt M; Hahn M
Oncol Res Treat; 2014; 37(11):628-32. PubMed ID: 25427580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ductoscopy and intraductal vacuum assisted biopsy in women with pathologic nipple discharge.
Hünerbein M; Raubach M; Gebauer B; Schneider W; Schlag PM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 16752074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancing area surrounding breast carcinoma on MR mammography: comparison with pathological examination.
Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Tjalma WA; Weyler J; De Schepper A
Eur Radiol; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1363-70. PubMed ID: 15045522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is Ductography Still Warranted in the 21st century?
Baydoun S; Gonzalez P; Whitman GJ; Dryden M; Xi Y; Dogan B
Breast J; 2019 Jul; 25(4):654-662. PubMed ID: 31087408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. BI-RADS-MRI terminology and evaluation of intraductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tozaki M
Breast Cancer; 2013 Jan; 20(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 22109641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of the skin and nipple of the breast: differentiation between tumour recurrence and post-treatment change.
Ralleigh G; Walker AE; Hall-Craggs MA; Lakhani SR; Saunders C
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1651-8. PubMed ID: 11511886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Nipple discharge without palpable tumor. Apropos of 46 cases].
Levèque J; Priou G; Palaric JC; De Korvin B; Marcorelles P; Poulain P
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1990 May; 85(5):329-35. PubMed ID: 2165275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component.
Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Tjalma WA; De Schepper A; Weyler J; Parizel PM
Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 17223002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Singletary SE; Stephens TW; Marcy S; Meric F; Ross MI; Babiera GV; Ames FC; Kuerer HM
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Mar; 196(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 12648684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D-MR Ductography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Mammography in Patients with Suspicious Nipple Discharge; a Feasibility Study.
Nicholson BT; Harvey JA; Patrie JT; Mugler JP
Breast J; 2015; 21(4):352-62. PubMed ID: 25882883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail.
Lubina N; Schedelbeck U; Roth A; Weng AM; Geissinger E; Hönig A; Hahn D; Bley TA
Eur Radiol; 2015 May; 25(5):1285-93. PubMed ID: 25433415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast duct endoscopy: ductoscopy from a diagnostic to an interventional procedure and its future perspective.
Dubowy A; Raubach M; Topalidis T; Lange T; Eulenstein S; Hünerbein M
Acta Chir Belg; 2011; 111(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 21780520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
