These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15551565)

  • 1. Estimation of tube potential in mammography from transmission measurements.
    Garton AJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Aug; 39(8):1247-61. PubMed ID: 15551565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic x-ray unit kilovoltage test tool based on k-edge absorption effect.
    Napolitano ME; Trueblood JH; Hertel NE; David G
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2169-76. PubMed ID: 12349939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography using MCNP4C.
    Ay MR; Shahriari M; Sarkar S; Adib M; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):4897-917. PubMed ID: 15584526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography.
    Jennings RJ; Eastgate RJ; Siedband MP; Ergun DL
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(5):629-39. PubMed ID: 7290015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A fast non-invasive beam check for mammography x-ray units.
    Gambaccini M; Marziani M; Rimondi O
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Sep; 39(9):1423-35. PubMed ID: 15552114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The imaging performance of compact Lu2O3:Eu powdered phosphor screens: Monte Carlo simulation for applications in mammography.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1985-97. PubMed ID: 19610287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. X-ray spectroscopy in mammography with a silicon PIN photodiode with application to the measurement of tube voltage.
    Künzel R; Herdade SB; Terini RA; Costa PR
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2996-3003. PubMed ID: 15587652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct analysis of molybdenum target generated x-ray spectra with a portable device.
    Stumbo S; Bottigli U; Golosio B; Oliva P; Tangaro S
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2763-70. PubMed ID: 15543781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Ay MR; Sarkar S; Shahriari M; Sardari D; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1660-75. PubMed ID: 16013725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct measurement of mammographic x-ray spectra using a CdZnTe detector.
    Matsumoto M; Yamamoto A; Honda I; Taniguchi A; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 10947252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of scatter reduction method and monochromatic beams on image quality and dose in mammography.
    Moeckli R; Verdun FR; Fiedler S; Pachoud M; Bulling S; Schnyder P; Valley JF
    Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3156-64. PubMed ID: 14713082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A special ionisation chamber for quality control of diagnostic and mammography X ray equipment.
    Costa AM; Caldas LV
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 12862242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte carlo simulation of the compton scattering technique applied to characterize diagnostic x-ray spectra.
    Gallardo S; Ródenas J; Verdú G
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2082-90. PubMed ID: 15305461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.