168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15551569)
1. A method of using noise as a test pattern for determining image enhancement filters.
Burgess AE; Ghandeharian H
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Aug; 39(8):1313-8. PubMed ID: 15551569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography.
Padgett R; Kotre CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(6):977-86. PubMed ID: 15104320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images.
Saunders RS; Samei E
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):3006-17. PubMed ID: 14655948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.
Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2323-31. PubMed ID: 14528954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. C-arm calibration--is it really necessary?
Jain A; Kon R; Zhou Y; Fichtinger G
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):639-46. PubMed ID: 16685900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Resolution enhancement in digital x-ray imaging.
Gravel P; Després P; Beaudoin G; de Guise JA
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2415-39. PubMed ID: 16675861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonuniform noise propagation by using the ramp filter in fan-beam computed tomography.
Zeng GL
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jun; 23(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 15191143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study of digital mammographic equipments by phantom image quality.
Mayo P; Rodenas F; Verdú G; Campayo JM; Villaescusa JI
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1994-6. PubMed ID: 17946081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images.
McLoughlin KJ; Bones PJ; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 15027524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new weighting scheme for cone-beam helical CT to reduce the image noise.
Taguchi K; Chiang BS; Silver MD
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2351-64. PubMed ID: 15248582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real time adaptive filtering for digital X-ray applications.
Bockenbach O; Mangin M; Schuberth S
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):578-87. PubMed ID: 17354937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of the two-dimensional detective quantum efficiency of a computed radiography system.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Månsson LG
Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3172-82. PubMed ID: 14713084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fast computation of Hessian-based enhancement filters for medical images.
Yang SF; Cheng CH
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):215-25. PubMed ID: 24891123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A flexible patch based approach for combined denoising and contrast enhancement of digital X-ray images.
Irrera P; Bloch I; Delplanque M
Med Image Anal; 2016 Feb; 28():33-45. PubMed ID: 26716719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardized evaluation methodology for 2-D-3-D registration.
van de Kraats EB; Penney GP; Tomazevic D; van Walsum T; Niessen WJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1177-89. PubMed ID: 16156355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms.
Gagne RM; Gallas BD; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 16485413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
