These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15551585)

  • 1. Evaluation of task-oriented performance of several fully 3D PET reconstruction algorithms.
    Matej S; Herman GT; Narayan TK; Furuie SS; Lewitt RM; Kinahan PE
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Mar; 39(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 15551585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D reconstruction in electron microscopy using ART with smooth spherically symmetric volume elements (blobs).
    Marabini R; Herman GT; Carazo JM
    Ultramicroscopy; 1998 Apr; 72(1-2):53-65. PubMed ID: 9561797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
    Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A methodology for testing for statistically significant differences between fully 3D PET reconstruction algorithms.
    Furuie SS; Herman GT; Narayan TK; Kinahan PE; Karp JS; Lewitt RM; Matej S
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Mar; 39(3):341-54. PubMed ID: 15551584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of filtered backprojection reconstruction and iterative reconstruction methods for PET images.
    Wang CX; Snyder WE; Bilbro G; Santago P
    Comput Biol Med; 1998 Jan; 28(1):13-24; discussion 24-5. PubMed ID: 9644571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
    Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
    Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
    Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
    Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient projection and backprojection scheme for spherically symmetric basis functions in divergent beam geometry.
    Ziegler A; Köhler T; Nielsen T; Proksa R
    Med Phys; 2006 Dec; 33(12):4653-63. PubMed ID: 17278818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Optimization of PET image quality by means of 3D data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction].
    Doll J; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Brix G
    Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Mar; 37(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 9547752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of basis functions for 3D PET reconstruction using a Monte Carlo system matrix.
    Cabello J; Rafecas M
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1759-77. PubMed ID: 22407258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motion-compensated iterative cone-beam CT image reconstruction with adapted blobs as basis functions.
    Isola AA; Ziegler A; Koehler T; Niessen WJ; Grass M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6777-97. PubMed ID: 18997267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
    Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the relation between Kaiser-Bessel blob and tube of response based modelling of the system matrix in iterative PET image reconstruction.
    Lougovski A; Hofheinz F; Maus J; Schramm G; van den Hoff J
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(10):4209-24. PubMed ID: 25955699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D RBI-EM reconstruction with spherically-symmetric basis function for SPECT rotating slat collimator.
    Wang W; Hawkins W; Gagnon D
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2273-92. PubMed ID: 15248577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maximum-Likelihood Expectation-Maximization Algorithm Versus Windowed Filtered Backprojection Algorithm: A Case Study.
    Zeng GL
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Jun; 46(2):129-132. PubMed ID: 29438005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compressed sensing for reduction of noise and artefacts in direct PET image reconstruction.
    Richter D; Basse-Lüsebrink TC; Kampf T; Fischer A; Israel I; Schneider M; Jakob PM; Samnick S
    Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 23756331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
    Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors.
    Schmidtlein CR; Beattie BJ; Bailey DL; Akhurst TJ; Wang W; Gönen M; Kirov AS; Humm JL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(20):6299-326. PubMed ID: 20924132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NEMA NU4-2008 image quality performance report for the microPET focus 120 and for various transmission and reconstruction methods.
    Bahri MA; Plenevaux A; Warnock G; Luxen A; Seret A
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1730-8. PubMed ID: 19759103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.