These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15551585)

  • 61. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Choosing the ART relaxation parameter for Clear-PEM 2D image reconstruction.
    Mesquita J; Matela N; Oliveira N; Martins MV; Almeida P
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 May; 98(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 20022658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The Gamma Characteristic of Reconstructed PET Images: Implications for ROI Analysis.
    Mou T; Huang J; O'Sullivan F
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 May; 37(5):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 29727273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Iterative reconstruction for differential phase contrast imaging using spherically symmetric basis functions.
    Köhler T; Brendel B; Roessl E
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4542-5. PubMed ID: 21928625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Improved quantitation for PET/CT image reconstruction with system modeling and anatomical priors.
    Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4095-103. PubMed ID: 17153389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Fully 3D list-mode time-of-flight PET image reconstruction on GPUs using CUDA.
    Cui JY; Pratx G; Prevrhal S; Levin CS
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6775-86. PubMed ID: 22149859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Iterative versus filtered backprojection reconstruction for statistical parametric mapping of PET activation measurements: a comparative case study.
    Reinders AA; Paans AM; de Jong BM; den Boer JA; Willemsen AT
    Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 11771986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Analytical reconstruction of deconvolved Fourier rebinned PET sinograms.
    Alessio A; Sauer K; Kinahan P
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 16357432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Evaluation of dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm reconstruction for quantitative 15O brain PET.
    Ibaraki M; Sato K; Mizuta T; Kitamura K; Miura S; Sugawara S; Shinohara Y; Kinoshita T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 23(7):627-38. PubMed ID: 19562437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Fast EM-like methods for maximum "a posteriori" estimates in emission tomography.
    de Pierro AR; Beleza Yamagishi ME
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Apr; 20(4):280-8. PubMed ID: 11370895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. View-independent reconstruction algorithms for cone beam CT with general saddle trajectory.
    Yang H; Li M; Koizumi K; Kudo H
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3865-84. PubMed ID: 16861786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. One-mSv CT colonography: Effect of different iterative reconstruction algorithms on radiologists' performance.
    Shin CI; Kim SH; Im JP; Kim SG; Yu MH; Lee ES; Han JK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Mar; 85(3):641-8. PubMed ID: 26860679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Three-dimensional reconstruction from reduced sets of very noisy images acquired following a single-axis tilt schema: application of a new three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm and objective comparison with weighted backprojection.
    Marabini R; Rietzel E; Schroeder R; Herman GT; Carazo JM
    J Struct Biol; 1997 Dec; 120(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 9441939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Enhanced 3D PET OSEM reconstruction using inter-update Metz filtering.
    Jacobson M; Levkovitz R; Ben-Tal A; Thielemans K; Spinks T; Belluzzo D; Pagani E; Bettinardi V; Gilardi MC; Zverovich A; Mitra G
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Aug; 45(8):2417-39. PubMed ID: 10958204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Noise properties of the EM algorithm: I. Theory.
    Barrett HH; Wilson DW; Tsui BM
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 May; 39(5):833-46. PubMed ID: 15552088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The image quality of FBP and MLEM reconstruction.
    Wieczorek H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):3161-76. PubMed ID: 20479513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Implementation of three-dimensional image reconstruction for multi-ring positron tomographs.
    Defrise M; Townsend D; Geissbuhler A
    Phys Med Biol; 1990 Oct; 35(10):1361-72. PubMed ID: 2243841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Alternatives to voxels for image representation in iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Lewitt RM
    Phys Med Biol; 1992 Mar; 37(3):705-16. PubMed ID: 1565698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Execution times of five reconstruction algorithms in 3D positron emission tomography.
    Egger ML; Morel C
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Mar; 43(3):703-12. PubMed ID: 9533147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.