362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15551686)
21. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
Claxton LD
Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15652224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Do the right thing.
Olshansky E
J Prof Nurs; 2007; 23(4):185-6. PubMed ID: 17675112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.
Duff K; O'Bryant SE; Westervelt HJ; Sweet JJ; Reynolds CR; van Gorp WG; Tranel D; McCaffrey RJ
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 24(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 19640873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. When reviews attack: ethics, free speech, and the peer review process.
Hadjistavropoulos T; Bieling PJ
Can Psychol; 2000 Aug; 41(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 16440473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Conflicts of interest and scientific integrity.
Friedman L; Richter ED
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2005; 11(2):205-6. PubMed ID: 15875898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.
Claxton LD
Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Nurses' satisfaction with their work environment and the outcomes of clinical nursing supervision on nurses' experiences of well-being -- a Norwegian study.
Bégat I; Ellefsen B; Severinsson E
J Nurs Manag; 2005 May; 13(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 15819834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [From misconduct to scientific probity: a turning towards prevention].
Sylvain H
Rech Soins Infirm; 2001 Sep; (66):4-15. PubMed ID: 12038284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Publication ethics.
Morton NS
Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Oct; 19(10):1011-3. PubMed ID: 19619189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Code of ethics and conduct for European nursing.
Sasso L; Stievano A; González Jurado M; Rocco G
Nurs Ethics; 2008 Nov; 15(6):821-36. PubMed ID: 18849371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Nursing competencies for spiritual care.
Baldacchino DR
J Clin Nurs; 2006 Jul; 15(7):885-96. PubMed ID: 16879381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Scientific misconduct, mistakes or something in between?].
Levi R
Lakartidningen; 2006 Apr 12-25; 103(15-16):1203-5. PubMed ID: 16696201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Professional competence: factors described by nurses as influencing their development.
Khomeiran RT; Yekta ZP; Kiger AM; Ahmadi F
Int Nurs Rev; 2006 Mar; 53(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 16430763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The professional self-image of nurses in Belgian hospitals: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.
Siebens K; Casterlé BD; Abraham I; Dierckx K; Braes T; Darras E; Dubois Y; Milisen K;
Int J Nurs Stud; 2006 Jan; 43(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 15972211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bossonomics destructive leadership.
Shewchuk M
Can Oper Room Nurs J; 2008 Mar; 26(1):33-4, 36, 38. PubMed ID: 18444473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Nurse manager support: how do staff nurses define it?
Schmalenberg C; Kramer M
Crit Care Nurse; 2009 Aug; 29(4):61-9. PubMed ID: 19648599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Registered nurses' perceptions of educational preparation for professional work and development in their profession.
Danielson E; Berntsson L
Nurse Educ Today; 2007 Nov; 27(8):900-8. PubMed ID: 17336430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
