256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15552081)
1. Noise and signal decoupling in maximum-likelihood reconstructions and Metz filters for PET brain images.
Liow JS; Strother SC
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Apr; 39(4):735-50. PubMed ID: 15552081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of image reconstruction algorithm on neurotransmission PET studies in humans: comparison between filtered backprojection and ordered subsets expectation maximization.
Morimoto T; Ito H; Takano A; Ikoma Y; Seki C; Okauchi T; Tanimoto K; Ando A; Shiraishi T; Yamaya T; Suhara T
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 20(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 16715957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compressed sensing for reduction of noise and artefacts in direct PET image reconstruction.
Richter D; Basse-Lüsebrink TC; Kampf T; Fischer A; Israel I; Schneider M; Jakob PM; Samnick S
Z Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 24(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 23756331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of resolution recovery by using collimator detector response during 3D OSEM image reconstruction on (99m)Tc-ECD brain SPET images.
Kalantari F; Rajabi H; Ay MR; Razavi-Ratki SK; Fard-Esfahani A; Beiki D; Eftekhari M; Fallahi B; Sadeghian L; Emami-Ardekani A
Hell J Nucl Med; 2012; 15(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 22741145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of noise adaptive non-linear gaussian filter in FDG-PET study.
Nagayoshi M; Murase K; Fujino K; Uenishi Y; Kawamata M; Nakamura Y; Kitamura K; Higuchi I; Oku N; Hatazawa J
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 19(6):469-77. PubMed ID: 16248383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.
Cheng JC; Shoghi K; Laforest R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1029-41. PubMed ID: 22320813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of noise in full Monte Carlo ML-EM and dual matrix reconstructions in positron emission tomography.
Rehfeld N; Alber M
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3498-507. PubMed ID: 17022246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment.
Riddell C; Carson RE; Carrasquillo JA; Libutti SK; Danforth DN; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):1316-23. PubMed ID: 11535719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A modified OSEM algorithm for PET reconstruction using wavelet processing.
Lee NY; Choi Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Dec; 80(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 16274838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.
Schöder H; Erdi YE; Chao K; Gonen M; Larson SM; Yeung HW
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15073250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative reconstruction methods in dynamic brain PET studies.
Reilhac A; Tomeï S; Buvat I; Michel C; Keheren F; Costes N
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):359-68. PubMed ID: 17920931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of ordered-subsets expectation maximization with 3D post-reconstruction Gauss filtering and comparison with filtered backprojection in 99mTc SPECT.
Brambilla M; Cannillo B; Dominietto M; Leva L; Secco C; Inglese E
Ann Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 19(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 15909485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A phantom for investigation of tumour signal and noise in PET reconstruction with various smoothing filters: experiments and comparisons with simulated intensity diffusion.
Skretting A; Glomset O; Bogsrud TV
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):191-4. PubMed ID: 20176733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sinogram bow-tie filtering in FBP PET reconstruction.
Abella M; Vaquero JJ; Soto-Montenegro ML; Lage E; Desco M
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1663-71. PubMed ID: 19544783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FDG-PET parametric imaging by total variation minimization.
Guo H; Renaut RA; Chen K; Reiman E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 19261438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of parametric FBP and OS-EM reconstruction algorithm images for PET dynamic study.
Oda K; Toyama H; Uemura K; Ikoma Y; Kimura Y; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Oct; 15(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 11758946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
Kamasak ME; Bouman CA; Morris ED; Sauer K
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
