These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15552349)

  • 1. Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.
    Buchner A; Rothermund K; Wentura D; Mehl B
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):722-31. PubMed ID: 15552349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.
    Buchner A; Mehl B; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 17128604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall.
    Buchner A; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jan; 33(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 15915795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Körner U; Buchner A; Bell R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 27798754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect.
    Buchner A; Bell R; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Apr; 36(3):617-28. PubMed ID: 18491501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29629780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distraction control processes in free recall: benefits and costs to performance.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hodgetts HM; Beaman CP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):118-33. PubMed ID: 25329080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
    Neely CB; LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10087854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Dentale S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1542-57. PubMed ID: 22612161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disruption of short-term memory by distractor speech: does content matter?
    Bell R; Mund I; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 20544562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Affective valence of words, explicit and implicit memory in clinical depression.
    Danion JM; Kauffmann-Muller F; Grangé D; Zimmermann MA; Greth P
    J Affect Disord; 1995 Jun; 34(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 7560551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The word concreteness effect occurs for positive, but not negative, emotion words in immediate serial recall.
    Tse CS; Altarriba J
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Feb; 100(Pt 1):91-109. PubMed ID: 18559138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating the role of attentional resources in the irrelevant speech effect.
    Elliott EM; Briganti AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 22459560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postcategorical auditory distraction in short-term memory: Insights from increased task load and task type.
    Marsh JE; Yang J; Qualter P; Richardson C; Perham N; Vachon F; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):882-897. PubMed ID: 29389192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modality effects in sentence recall.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall.
    LeCompte DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Nov; 20(6):1396-408. PubMed ID: 7983471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall.
    Howard MW; Kahana MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jul; 25(4):923-41. PubMed ID: 10439501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.