These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15552357)

  • 1. Strengthening the activation of unconsciously activated memories.
    Goodmon LB; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):804-18. PubMed ID: 15552357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cue set size effects: sampling activated associates or cross-target interference?
    Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Xu J
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 10355236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McKinney VM; Gee NR; Janczura GA
    Psychol Rev; 1998 Apr; 105(2):299-324. PubMed ID: 9577240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priming and false memories from Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists on a fragment completion test with children.
    Diliberto-Macaluso KA
    Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 15822608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encoding context and retrieval conditions as determinants of the effects of natural category size.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Schreiber TA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jan; 16(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 2136751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Ceo D
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1014-23. PubMed ID: 17910185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age effects in cued recall: sources from implicit and explicit memory.
    McEvoy CL; Holley PE; Nelson DL
    Psychol Aging; 1995 Sep; 10(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 8527053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.
    Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Gee NR; Schreiber TA; McKinney VM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Jul; 19(4):747-64. PubMed ID: 8345322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic Search in the Remote Associates Test.
    Davelaar EJ
    Top Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 7(3):494-512. PubMed ID: 25982148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spreading activation or spooky action at a distance?
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Pointer L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 12549582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
    Nelson DL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disrupting attention: the need for retrieval cues in working memory theories.
    Nelson DL; Goodmon LB
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 12699144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.
    Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Holley PE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):671-84. PubMed ID: 1435270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unconscious activation of task sets.
    Reuss H; Kiesel A; Kunde W; Hommel B
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 21396830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Level of processing and age affect involuntary conceptual priming of weak but not strong associates.
    Ramponi C; Richardson-Klavehn A; Gardiner JM
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 15267124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.
    Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impaired implicit memory for gist information in amnesia.
    Verfaellie M; Page K; Orlando F; Schacter DL
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Nov; 19(6):760-9. PubMed ID: 16351351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of automatic and intentional instructions when using the method of vanishing cues in acquired brain injury.
    Riley GA; Venn P
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2015; 25(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 25066788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.