These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15552395)

  • 1. Relationship between malpractice claims and medical care quality.
    Tsai WC; Kung PT; Chiang YJ
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2004; 17(7):394-400. PubMed ID: 15552395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims in Saudi Arabia: Incidence and cause.
    AlDakhil LO
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 May; 40():8-11. PubMed ID: 26947435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of medical litigation filed against obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery departments.
    Hamasaki T; Hagihara A
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Oct; 16(1):72. PubMed ID: 26498823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. I. Epidemiology of error in four specialties.
    Kravitz RL; Rolph JE; McGuigan K
    JAMA; 1991 Oct; 266(15):2087-92. PubMed ID: 1920696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Malpractice claims data as a quality improvement tool. II. Is targeting effective?
    Rolph JE; Kravitz RL; McGuigan K
    JAMA; 1991 Oct; 266(15):2093-7. PubMed ID: 1920697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between malpractice claims history and subsequent obstetric care.
    Entman SS; Glass CA; Hickson GB; Githens PB; Whetten-Goldstein K; Sloan FA
    JAMA; 1994 Nov 23-30; 272(20):1588-91. PubMed ID: 7966868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology.
    White AA; Pichert JW; Bledsoe SH; Irwin C; Entman SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1031-8. PubMed ID: 15863541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.
    Levinson W; Roter DL; Mullooly JP; Dull VT; Frankel RM
    JAMA; 1997 Feb; 277(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 9032162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk factor analysis of medical litigation outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology: A retrospective cohort study of 344 claims in Japan.
    Kamijo K; Shibata A; Yamamoto N; Watanabe J; Watari T
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2024 Oct; 107():102752. PubMed ID: 39317098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer malpractice litigation in New York State.
    Mitnick JS; Vazquez MF; Plesser KP; Roses DF
    Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):673-6. PubMed ID: 8234689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Malpractice risk at the physician level: Claim-prone physicians.
    Gómez-Durán EL; Martin-Fumadó C; Benet-Travé J; Arimany-Manso J
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2018 Aug; 58():152-154. PubMed ID: 29981507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of Simulation Training With Rates of Medical Malpractice Claims Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists.
    Schaffer AC; Babayan A; Einbinder JS; Sato L; Gardner R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 138(2):246-252. PubMed ID: 34237759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduced medicolegal risk by compliance with obstetric clinical pathways: a case--control study.
    Ransom SB; Studdert DM; Dombrowski MP; Mello MM; Brennan TA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 101(4):751-5. PubMed ID: 12681881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Preventable treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. From the practice of an expert commission].
    Cyran W
    Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 7959312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisource Evaluation of Surgeon Behavior Is Associated With Malpractice Claims.
    Lagoo J; Berry WR; Miller K; Neal BJ; Sato L; Lillemoe KD; Doherty GM; Kasser JR; Chaikof EL; Gawande AA; Haynes AB
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jul; 270(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 29578910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bad "bad baby" bills.
    Mehlman MJ
    Am J Law Med; 1994; 20(1-2):129-45. PubMed ID: 7801974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the Physician Insurers Association of America database as a surveillance tool for diabetes-related malpractice claims in the U.S.
    Meredith V; Cook CB; Penman A
    Diabetes Care; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1096-100. PubMed ID: 9653602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in malpractice claims for obstetric and gynecologic procedures, 2005 through 2014.
    Glaser LM; Alvi FA; Milad MP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):340.e1-340.e6. PubMed ID: 28549980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The problems in organizing forensic medical expertise in cases of professional law infringements by medical workers (exemplified by obstetrical-gynecological service)].
    Plaksin VO; Gurtovoĭ BL; Oboĭmakov VB
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1994; 37(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8184455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Briefing and accusation of medical malpractice--the second victim].
    Wienke A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2013 Apr; 92 Suppl 1():S1-22. PubMed ID: 23625708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.