337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15553286)
1. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations.
Prakki A; Cilli R; Saad JO; Rodrigues JR
Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 15553286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings.
Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Lima FG; Donassollo TA; André Dde A; Leida FL
J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 17034926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique.
Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resin composite contours.
Sidelsky H
Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):395-401. PubMed ID: 20448605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations.
Cenci MS; Demarco FF; Pereira CL; Lund RG; de Carvalho RM
Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 17380807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary restoration of Class II caries. Direct posterior composites.
Abel MG
Dent Today; 2002 Nov; 21(11):94-7. PubMed ID: 12483933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations.
Moosavi H; Abedini S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Sep; 10(5):E009-16. PubMed ID: 19838605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
Rada RE
Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The axial bevel technique: a new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations.
Liebenberg WH
Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 11203930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of sectional matrix systems in class II direct composite restorations.
Lowe RA
Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):108, 110-2. PubMed ID: 15559461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction.
Chuang SF; Su KC; Wang CH; Chang CH
J Dent; 2011 Jun; 39(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 21504778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overcoming obstacles to placing posterior direct resin restorations.
Bertolotti RL
Dent Today; 2000 Jul; 19(7):66-71. PubMed ID: 12524821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.
Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
Koczarski MJ; Corredor AC
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):87-94; quiz 96. PubMed ID: 11905163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: considerations on finishing/polishing. Clinical procedures.
Ferreira Rde S; Lopes GC; Baratieri LN
Quintessence Int; 2004 May; 35(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 15130074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative technique for class V resin composite restorations with minimum finishing/polishing procedures.
Perez CR
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 20533640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Class II composite placement is difficult! Solutions to help overcome the clinical challenges.
Goodchild JH
Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):110, 112, 114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 24358548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The long-term effect of a composite resin restoration on proximal contact tightness.
Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Plasschaert AJ
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 16904254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
