These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15553286)

  • 41. Esthetic posterior restorations: direct composite resins.
    Strassler HE
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(6):216-20. PubMed ID: 1299295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effectiveness of different polymerization protocols for class II composite resin restorations.
    de Jong LC; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JJ; Wolke JG; Geitenbeek B
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 17383067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
    El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 133(10):1387-98. PubMed ID: 12403542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools.
    Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Veiga Filho LC; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 11204001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement.
    Nash RW; Lowe RA; Leinfelder K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1099-104. PubMed ID: 11575016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques.
    Monteiro PM; Manso MC; Gavinha S; Melo P
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Mar; 141(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 20194388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part I. Proper cavity preparation and placement techniques.
    Full CA; Hollander WR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 8432947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bite-formed posterior resin composite restorations, placed with a self-etching primer and a novel matrix.
    Bertolotti RL; Laamanen H
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):419-22. PubMed ID: 10635278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R; Santiago SL; Mendonça JS; Passos VF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation.
    van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1101-7. PubMed ID: 17113139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Materials and techniques for achieving clinical excellence with indirect composite restorations.
    Brucia JJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Jan; 45(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 11210701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The proximal precinct in direct posterior composite restorations: interproximal integrity.
    Liebenberg WH
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 14(7):587-94; quiz 596. PubMed ID: 12373946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Class I and II composite resin restorations: 4-year clinical follow up.
    Lundin SA; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):217-27. PubMed ID: 2603125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Posterior resin composite restorations: a new technique.
    Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Correa M; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):733-8. PubMed ID: 9161264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of proximal contacts of Class II resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Loomans BA; Opdam NJ; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM; Burgersdijk RC
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):688-93. PubMed ID: 17153978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Simplified primary incisor proximal restoration.
    Croll TP; Berg J
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 12627705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.