These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1555388)

  • 21. Comparison of diagnostic yields of clinical and radiographic caries examinations in children of different age.
    Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 15471524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monitoring of caries progression in permanent and primary posterior approximal enamel by bitewing radiography.
    Pitts NB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1983 Aug; 11(4):228-35. PubMed ID: 6349915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination.
    Ekstrand KR; Ricketts DN; Kidd EA
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 9165195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of the ICDAS system and two fluorescence-based intraoral devices for examination of occlusal surfaces.
    Theocharopoulou A; Lagerweij MD; van Strijp AJ
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 25793954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Approximal caries diagnosis in epidemiological studies: transillumination or bitewing radiographs?
    Obry-Musset AM; Cahen PM; Turlot JC; Frank RM
    J Biol Buccale; 1988 Mar; 16(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 3165088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Radiographic evaluation of occlusal caries: effect of training and experience.
    Lazarchik DA; Firestone AR; Heaven TJ; Filler SJ; Lussi A
    Caries Res; 1995; 29(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 8521436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of approximal caries in primary molars on caries rate for the mesial surface of the first permanent molar in swedish children from 6 to 12 years of age.
    Mejàre I; Stenlund H; Julihn A; Larsson I; Permert L
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 11385197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study.
    Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Randomized selection of bitewing radiographs: analysis and clinical management thereof [corrected].
    Pillai K; Hollist NO
    Odontostomatol Trop; 1999 Mar; 22(85):11-4. PubMed ID: 11372097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In Vivo and In Vitro performance of Conventional Methods, DIAGNOdent, and an Electronic Caries Monitor for Occlusal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Sener Y; Botsali MS
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):E14-22. PubMed ID: 26314593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth.
    Lussi A; Francescut P
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 12566632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-year-old Lithuanian children.
    Machiulskiene V; Nyvad B; Baelum V
    Caries Res; 1999; 33(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 10460957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vivo diagnosis of fissure caries using a new electrical resistance monitor.
    Lussi A; Firestone A; Schoenberg V; Hotz P; Stich H
    Caries Res; 1995; 29(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 7728833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiographic and laser fluorescence methods have no benefits for detecting caries in primary teeth.
    Mendes FM; Novaes TF; Matos R; Bittar DG; Piovesan C; Gimenez T; Imparato JC; Raggio DP; Braga MM
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):536-43. PubMed ID: 22907166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs.
    Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vitro comparison of the ability of fibre-optic transillumination, visual inspection and radiographs to detect occlusal caries and evaluate lesion depth.
    Côrtes DF; Ekstrand KR; Elias-Boneta AR; Ellwood RP
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 11093016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.
    Virajsilp V; Thearmontree A; Aryatawong S; Paiboonwarachat D
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 16532891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The reliability and accuracy of two methods for proximal caries detection and depth on directly visible proximal surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Ekstrand KR; Luna LE; Promisiero L; Cortes A; Cuevas S; Reyes JF; Torres CE; Martignon S
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 21412000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Treatment of proximal superficial caries lesions on primary molar teeth with resin infiltration and fluoride varnish versus fluoride varnish only: efficacy after 1 year.
    Ekstrand KR; Bakhshandeh A; Martignon S
    Caries Res; 2010; 44(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 20090327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.