406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15554993)
1. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates.
Deenadayalu VP; Chadalawada V; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 99(11):2138-42. PubMed ID: 15554993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.
Heresbach D; Barrioz T; Lapalus MG; Coumaros D; Bauret P; Potier P; Sautereau D; Boustière C; Grimaud JC; Barthélémy C; Sée J; Serraj I; D'Halluin PN; Branger B; Ponchon T
Endoscopy; 2008 Apr; 40(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 18389446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates.
Harrison M; Singh N; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Mar; 99(3):519-22. PubMed ID: 15056095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
Kessler WR; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates.
Kaltenbach T; Friedland S; Soetikno R
Gut; 2008 Oct; 57(10):1406-12. PubMed ID: 18523025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial.
Tribonias G; Theodoropoulou A; Konstantinidis K; Vardas E; Karmiris K; Chroniaris N; Chlouverakis G; Paspatis GA
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Oct; 12(10 Online):e260-6. PubMed ID: 19930146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel extra-wide-angle-view colonoscope: a simulated pilot study using anatomic colorectal models.
Uraoka T; Tanaka S; Matsumoto T; Matsuda T; Oka S; Moriyama T; Higashi R; Saito Y
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):480-3. PubMed ID: 23199903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic trimodal imaging for the detection and differentiation of colonic polyps.
van den Broek FJ; Fockens P; Van Eeden S; Kara MA; Hardwick JC; Reitsma JB; Dekker E
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 7(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19168154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study.
Hewett DG; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Aug; 74(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 21679946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of a novel colonoscope with extra-wide angle of view: a clinical study.
Uraoka T; Tanaka S; Oka S; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Moriyama T; Higashi R; Matsumoto T
Endoscopy; 2015 May; 47(5):444-8. PubMed ID: 25412088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study.
Rastogi A; Keighley J; Singh V; Callahan P; Bansal A; Wani S; Sharma P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Oct; 104(10):2422-30. PubMed ID: 19584829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study.
Leufkens AM; van Oijen MG; Vleggaar FP; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22441756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap.
Matsushita M; Hajiro K; Okazaki K; Takakuwa H; Tominaga M
Endoscopy; 1998 Jun; 30(5):444-7. PubMed ID: 9693890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
