These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15558334)

  • 21. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch.
    Azadani AN; Jaussaud N; Matthews PB; Chuter TA; Ge L; Guy TS; Guccione J; Tseng EE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19852139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics of the porcine pulmonary valve and root with regard to the ross procedure.
    Nagy ZL; Fisher J; Walker PG; Watterson KG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Aug; 120(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 10917944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
    Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Freedom from structural valve deterioration among patients aged < or = 60 years undergoing Freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement.
    Bach DS; Metras J; Doty JR; Yun KL; Dumesnil JG; Kon ND
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Nov; 16(6):649-55; discussion 656. PubMed ID: 18095515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stentless bioprostheses in small aortic roots: impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on survival and quality of life.
    Ennker J; Rosendahl U; Albert A; Dumlu E; Ennker IC; Florath I
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 16116880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve: five-year follow up.
    Nyawo B; Graham R; Hunter S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17315382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A novel approach to tricuspid valve replacement: the upside down stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Cardarelli MG; Gammie JS; Brown JM; Poston RS; Pierson RN; Griffith BP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Aug; 80(2):507-10. PubMed ID: 16039194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Kangaroo versus freestyle stentless bioprostheses in a juvenile sheep model: hemodynamic performance and calcification behavior.
    Neethling WM; Hodge AJ; Glancy R
    J Card Surg; 2005; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15673407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aortic root replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis in osteogenesis imperfecta.
    Wakiyama H; Okada Y; Kitamura A; Imai Y
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 18512491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Stentless Cryo-Life O'Brien porcine aortic valve at 10 years.
    Hvass U; Baron F; Elsebaey A; Nguyen D; Flecher E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):977-83; discussion 983. PubMed ID: 15597593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stentless valves versus stented bioprostheses at the aortic position: midterm results.
    Narang S; Satsangi DK; Banerjee A; Geelani MA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Oct; 136(4):943-7. PubMed ID: 18954634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implantation of a modified Freestyle valve with a single inflow suture line: technical patterns and advantages.
    Grandmougin D; Fayad G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 82(3):1128-30. PubMed ID: 16928565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reoperation for early failure of a freestyle bioprosthesis using a full root technique.
    Kitamura A; Handa N; Shomura Y; Wakiyama H; Shinka M; Fujiwara H; Nasu M; Tanabe K; Tani T; Morioka S; Okada Y
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 May; 16(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 17578047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical experience with the 3F stentless aortic bioprosthesis: one-year follow up.
    Linneweber J; Kossagk C; Rogge ML; Dushe S; Dohmen P; Konertz W
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 16901052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preassembled stentless valved-conduit for the replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic root.
    Bochenek-Klimczyk K; Lau KK; Galiñanes M; Sosnowski AW
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 7(6):964-8. PubMed ID: 18713779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement.
    Nozohoor S; Nilsson J; Lührs C; Roijer A; Sjögren J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1310-7. PubMed ID: 18355517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Biomechanical and flow characteristics of stentless and stented aortic valve bioprostheses].
    Gavrilenkov VI; Maslevtsov DV; Iukhnev AD; Perleĭ VE; Vrabiĭ AA
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2004; 163(5):25-30. PubMed ID: 15651690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.
    Cox JL; Ad N; Myers K; Gharib M; Quijano RC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 16077422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.