These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1555845)

  • 1. Compound regressive models for family data.
    Bonney GE
    Hum Hered; 1992; 42(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 1555845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search for faster methods of fitting the regressive models to quantitative traits.
    Demenais FM; Murigande C; Bonney GE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):319-34. PubMed ID: 2253867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporation of twins in the regressive logistic model for pedigree disease data.
    Hopper JL; Carlin JB; Macaskill GT; Derrick PL; Flander LB; Giles GG
    Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma); 1990; 39(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 2239103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid multipoint linkage analysis via inheritance vectors in the Elston-Stewart algorithm.
    O'Connell JR
    Hum Hered; 2001; 51(4):226-40. PubMed ID: 11287744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling sibship environment in the regressive logistic model for familial disease.
    Hopper JL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(1):235-40. PubMed ID: 2731711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical comparisons of two formulations of the logistic regressive models with the mixed model in segregation analysis of discrete traits.
    Demenais FM; Laing AE; Bonney GE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1992; 9(6):419-35. PubMed ID: 1487139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A family study of panic disorder: reanalysis using a regressive logistic model that incorporates a sibship environment.
    Hopper JL; Judd FK; Derrick PL; Macaskill GT; Burrows GD
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 2338231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regressive logistic models for familial diseases: a formulation assuming an underlying liability model.
    Demenais FM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1991 Oct; 49(4):773-85. PubMed ID: 1897524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Elston-Stewart algorithm for continuous genotypes and environmental factors.
    Elston RC; George VT; Severtson F
    Hum Hered; 1992; 42(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 1555844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of Swedish male breast cancer family data: a simple way to incorporate a common sibling effect.
    Karunaratne PM; Elston RC; Loman N; Olsson H; Ranstam J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 9554557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complex segregation analysis with pointers.
    Lalouel JM; Morton NE
    Hum Hered; 1981; 31(5):312-21. PubMed ID: 7333620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extension of the Haseman-Elston regression model to longitudinal data.
    Won S; Elston RC; Park T
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 16733364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equivalence of the mixed and regressive models for genetic analysis. I. Continuous traits.
    Demenais FM; Bonney GE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(5):597-617. PubMed ID: 2591730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined linkage and segregation analysis using regressive models.
    Bonney GE; Lathrop GM; Lalouel JM
    Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Jul; 43(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 3163888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of conditioning on probands to correct for multiple ascertainment.
    Boehnke M; Greenberg DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Nov; 36(6):1298-308. PubMed ID: 6517053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parametric estimation in a genetic mixture model with application to nuclear family data.
    Shoukri MM; McLachlan GJ
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):128-39. PubMed ID: 8086597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two new recursive likelihood calculation methods for genetic analysis.
    Yuan A; Bonney GE
    Hum Hered; 2002; 54(2):82-98. PubMed ID: 12566740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regression diagnostics for the class A regressive model with quantitative phenotypes.
    Wang HM; Jones MP; Burns TL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(3):174-87. PubMed ID: 10446465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative trait linkage analysis by generalized estimating equations: unification of variance components and Haseman-Elston regression.
    Chen WM; Broman KW; Liang KY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15095386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.