159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15558548)
1. Vertebral neoplastic compression fractures: assessment by dual-phase chemical shift imaging.
Eito K; Waka S; Naoko N; Makoto A; Atsuko H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 20(6):1020-4. PubMed ID: 15558548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Does dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI enable recognition of development of vertebral fractures in multiple myeloma?].
Scherer A; Wittsack HJ; Engelbrecht V; Strupp C; Poll LW; Willers R; Schneider P; Gattermann N; Haas R; Mödder U
Rofo; 2002 Aug; 174(8):984-90. PubMed ID: 12142975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The nuclear magnetic resonance tomographic differentiation of osteoporotic and tumor-related vertebral fractures. The value of subtractive TR gradient-echo sequences, STIR sequences and Gd-DTPA].
Stäbler A; Krimmel K; Seiderer M; Gärtner C; Fritsch S; Raum W
Rofo; 1992 Sep; 157(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 1391814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Differentiation of benign osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures with a diffusion-weighted, steady-state free precession sequence].
Baur A; Huber A; Dürr HR; Nikolaou K; Stäbler A; Deimling M; Reiser M
Rofo; 2002 Jan; 174(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11793288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging.
Baker LL; Goodman SB; Perkash I; Lane B; Enzmann DR
Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 2296658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertebral fractures in multiple myeloma: first results of assessment of fracture risk using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Scherer A; Wittsack HJ; Strupp C; Gattermann N; Haas R; Mödder U
Ann Hematol; 2002 Sep; 81(9):517-21. PubMed ID: 12373353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single shot fast spin echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the spine; Is it useful in differentiating malignant metastatic tumor infiltration from benign fracture edema?
Park SW; Lee JH; Ehara S; Park YB; Sung SO; Choi JA; Joo YE
Clin Imaging; 2004; 28(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 15050221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral fractures by chemical shift {in-phase and out-of phase} MR imaging.
Ragab Y; Emad Y; Gheita T; Mansour M; Abou-Zeid A; Ferrari S; Rasker JJ
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 18672340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures: fluid sign at MR imaging.
Baur A; Stäbler A; Arbogast S; Duerr HR; Bartl R; Reiser M
Radiology; 2002 Dec; 225(3):730-5. PubMed ID: 12461253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging of vertebral metastases at 0.2 Tesla: clinical evaluation of T1-weighted opposed-phase gradient-echo imaging.
Ohno S; Togami I; Sei T; Ida K; Tsunoda M; Yamaoka K; Kanazawa S; Hiraki Y
Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR; 2003; 35(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 15552725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of lesion ratio on diagnostic performance of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating acute benign vertebral fractures and metastases.
Lin F; Lei Y; Li YB
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Jun; 122(11):1293-9. PubMed ID: 19567140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone marrow fat quantification of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: comparison of multi-voxel proton MR spectroscopy and chemical-shift gradient-echo MR imaging.
Régis-Arnaud A; Guiu B; Walker PM; Krausé D; Ricolfi F; Ben Salem D
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1032-6. PubMed ID: 21948596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential diagnosis of vertebral compression fracture using in-phase/opposed-phase and short TI inversion recovery imaging.
Ogura A; Hayakawa K; Maeda F; Saeki F; Syukutani A; Shibutani S; Kuroda E
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 22416260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures.
Baur A; Stäbler A; Brüning R; Bartl R; Krödel A; Reiser M; Deimling M
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 9577479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar intervertebral discs in elderly patients with minor trauma.
Afzal S; Akbar S
Eur J Radiol; 2009 May; 70(2):352-6. PubMed ID: 18455897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diffusion-weighted imaging of acute vertebral compression: Differential diagnosis of benign versus malignant pathologic fractures].
Abanoz R; Hakyemez B; Parlak M
Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Jun; 9(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 14661485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dual-phase chemical-shift imaging in the detection of diffuse bone metastasis].
Kozawa E; Saito W; Nishi N; Amanuma M; Heshiki A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 64(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 14994513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of diffusion abnormalities in benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures by line scan diffusion-weighted imaging.
Maeda M; Sakuma H; Maier SE; Takeda K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1203-9. PubMed ID: 14573404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
Cuénod CA; Laredo JD; Chevret S; Hamze B; Naouri JF; Chapaux X; Bondeville JM; Tubiana JM
Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):541-9. PubMed ID: 8668809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [MRI in osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral compressions: apropos of 60 cases].
Lafforgue P; Bayle O; Massonnat J; Cournelle JM; Schiano A; Kasbarian M; Acquaviva PC
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1991; 34(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 1929146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
