507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15558576)
1. Comparison of statistical methods for analysis of clustered binary observations.
Heo M; Leon AC
Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):911-23. PubMed ID: 15558576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of a mixed effects logistic regression model for binary outcomes with unequal cluster size.
Heo M; Leon AC
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 15920895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strategies for analyzing multilevel cluster-randomized studies with binary outcomes collected at varying intervals of time.
Olsen MK; DeLong ER; Oddone EZ; Bosworth HB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6055-71. PubMed ID: 18825655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of statistical approaches for analyzing physician-randomized quality improvement interventions.
Stedman MR; Gagnon DR; Lew RA; Solomon DH; Brookhart MA
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 18571476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of statistical methods for clustered data analysis with Gaussian error.
Feng Z; McLerran D; Grizzle J
Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1793-806. PubMed ID: 8870161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size adjustments for varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes analyzed with second-order PQL mixed logistic regression.
Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1488-501. PubMed ID: 20101669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of methods for analyzing binary data arising from two-sample twin studies.
Gao XJ; Klar N; Donner A
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):349-63. PubMed ID: 9271709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simulation study to assess statistical methods for binary repeated measures data.
Masaoud E; Stryhn H
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Feb; 93(2-3):81-97. PubMed ID: 20004989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
Flynn TN; Peters TJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incorporating intermediate binary responses into interim analyses of clinical trials: a comparison of four methods.
Whitehead A; Sooriyarachchi MR; Whitehead J; Bolland K
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1646-66. PubMed ID: 17886243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling and analysing exchangeable binary data with random cluster sizes.
Xu JL; Prorok PC
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2401-16. PubMed ID: 12872298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of retrospective sampling on binary regression models for clustered data.
Neuhaus JM; Jewell NP
Biometrics; 1990 Dec; 46(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 2085642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the risk difference, risk ratio and odds ratio scales for quantifying the unadjusted intervention effect in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC; Forbes AB; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5143-55. PubMed ID: 18613226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
Yin G; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
