These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15559381)
21. [Objective methods of fitting speech processors of cochlear implants Combi-40/40+ and Tempo+: impedance technique]. Petrov SM; Shchukina AA Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2007; (5):20-2. PubMed ID: 18163073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic. Verhaegen VJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hearing aids: a review of what's new. Kim HH; Barrs DM Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Jun; 134(6):1043-50. PubMed ID: 16730553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cochlear implants and hearing aids: some personal and professional reflections. Ross M J Rehabil Res Dev; 2008; 45(5):xvii-xxii. PubMed ID: 18816420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Auditory models for hearing and fitting criteria. Leijon A Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 17():112-6. PubMed ID: 6577551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The rationale for multi-channel amplitude compression combined with post-compression equalization. Villchur E Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):163-77. PubMed ID: 292141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Half-open bony channel technique for fixation of the Vibrant Soundbridge. Vent J; Luers JC; Beutner D Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 34(1):87-8. PubMed ID: 19260905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Residual hearing preservation after cochlear implantation: comparison between straight and perimodiolar implants. Soda-Merhy A; Gonzalez-Valenzuela L; Tirado-Gutierrez C Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Sep; 139(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 18722221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Sensorineural hearing loss in diabetes. Prosthetic care in hearing impaired patients]. Dlouhá O Vnitr Lek; 2007 May; 53(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 17642438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cochlear implantation in superficial siderosis. Kim CS; Song JJ; Park MH; Kim YH; Koo JW Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Aug; 126(8):892-6. PubMed ID: 16846938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma. Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Driscoll CL; Blevins N; Francis H; Niparko JK Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Traditional and emerging indications in cochlear and auditory brainstem implants. Cervera-Paz FJ; Manrique MJ Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 16496561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Implantable hearing devices. Jones S; Harris D; Estill A; Mikulec AA Mo Med; 2008; 105(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 18630303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The treatment of deafness]. Montandon P Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1990 Aug; 79(33):937-8. PubMed ID: 2396054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation. Morris LG; Mallur PS; Roland JT; Waltzman SB; Lalwani AK Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Auditory performance of cochlear implant children aged 2-5 years. Thawin C; Kanchanalarp C; Lertsukprasert K; Cheewaruangroj W; Khantapasuantara K; Ruencharoen S J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Nov; 89(11):1923-7. PubMed ID: 17205875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mail order hearing aids. ASHA; 1990 Apr; 32(4):51. PubMed ID: 2334473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]