206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15559717)
1. Was there sufficient nurse expert testimony to go to a jury? Case on point: Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 2004 WL 2222384 -CA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Oct; 45(5):2. PubMed ID: 15559717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurses' negligence explored by California court. Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2005 Sep; 22(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 16130833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Delivering the verdict.
Nursing; 2003 Dec; 33(12):28. PubMed ID: 14708540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nurse-expert fails to 'go to bat' in testifying for plaintiffs. Case on point: Ross v. Redding Medical Center, 2003 WL 21246105-CA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Jun; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 12886709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal briefs for nurses. PA: expert testimony on care standard--OK: testimony on causation & diagnosis--NG; MO: failure to recognize complications: admissibility of nursing staff meeting minutes.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Dec; 36(7):3. PubMed ID: 8685373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal strips "missing": did nurses monitor patient?
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 May; 40(12):2. PubMed ID: 11995057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 'Simian creases' prove 'prenatal' injury: no liability. Case on point: Day v. Zuschke, (01/03/2008) P.3d -AZ.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jul; 49(2):2. PubMed ID: 18727319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. $5 million jury verdict: fault apportioned 57% Dr. 43% RN.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Dec; 41(7):1. PubMed ID: 11995071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Five doctors & four nurses sued after delivery. Case on point: Livingston v. Montgomery, 0302.730 (2/27/2009)-TX.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Apr; 49(11):2. PubMed ID: 19499650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurses failed to respond to Ob/Gyn patient's pleas for help. Case on point: Nasser v. St. Vincent Hospital Health Svcs., 49A020919-CV-955, (4/14/2010)-IN.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 May; 50(12):4. PubMed ID: 20557021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Should nurse have called 'on-call' obstetrician stat? Case on point: Garhart v. Columbia/HealthONE, L.L.C., 2004 WL 1433331 P.2d -CO.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Jul; 45(2):2. PubMed ID: 15382493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nurses fail to timely respond: uterus ruptures--neurological injuries. Case on point: Howerton v. Mary Immaculate Hosp., 2002 WL 1269344 S.E.2d.-VA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jun; 43(1):2. PubMed ID: 12154444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Failure to use fetal monitor & timely call physician. Case in point: Garcia v. Providence Medical Center (806 P. 2d 766--WA (1991)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):4. PubMed ID: 1841401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Litigation, electronic fetal monitoring, and the obstetric nurse.
McRae MJ
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1993; 22(5):410-9. PubMed ID: 8246093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. VA: Did pressure applied by RN cause palsy: judgment on verdict for $1.75 milion affirmed. Jones v. Williams, 091745 VAC (11/4/2010) S.E..2d VA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Nov; 51(6):3. PubMed ID: 21158265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Plastic cup on i.v. site: nurse-expert testimony. Case in point: Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical Center (596 N.E. 2d 1110-OH [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Dec; 33(7):4. PubMed ID: 1494665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pt. deteriorates-nurses fail to call dr.-death results. Doctors Hospital, Doctors Hospital, 1997, L.P.[sic] v. Hernandez, 01-10-00270-CV TXCA1 (10/21/2010)-TX.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Dec; 51(7):1. PubMed ID: 21275328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Was fundal pressure by nurses during birth cause of brain damage? Case on point: Martinez v. Northridge Hospital Medical Ctr., 2003 WL 22234957-CA.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Oct; 44(5):2. PubMed ID: 14621515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Obstetrical liability update--Part I.
Fiesta J
Nurs Manage; 1995 Jul; 26(7):24. PubMed ID: 7603668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
