354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15560108)
1. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume.
Karges JR; Mark BE; Stikeleather SJ; Worrell TW
Phys Ther; 2003 Feb; 83(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 12564949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new device to measure upper limb circumferences: validity and reliability.
Devoogdt N; Lemkens H; Geraerts I; Van Nuland I; Flour M; Coremans T; Christiaens MR; Van Kampen M
Int Angiol; 2010 Oct; 29(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 20924341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement decisions for clinical assessment of limb volume changes in patients with bilateral and unilateral limb edema.
Mayrovitz HN; Macdonald J; Davey S; Olson K; Washington E
Phys Ther; 2007 Oct; 87(10):1362-8. PubMed ID: 17684090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.
Mori T; Lustman A; Katz-Leurer M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 May; 31(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25539094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simple and innovative device to measure arm volume at home for patients with lymphedema after breast cancer.
Lette J
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(34):5434-40. PubMed ID: 17135645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D stereophotogrammetry in upper-extremity lymphedema: An accurate diagnostic method.
Hameeteman M; Verhulst AC; Vreeken RD; Maal TJ; Ulrich DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 26590631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors associated with increased breast cancer-related lymphedema volume.
Vignes S; Arrault M; Dupuy A
Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(8):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17851861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional imaging for measuring the volume of the arm.
Erends M; van der Aa T; de Grzymala AP; van der Hulst R
Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25495383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of limb volume: laser scanning versus volume displacement.
McKinnon JG; Wong V; Temple WJ; Galbraith C; Ferry P; Clynch GS; Clynch C
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 96(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 17477361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Adriaenssens N; Buyl R; Lievens P; Fontaine C; Lamote J
Lymphology; 2013 Sep; 46(3):132-43. PubMed ID: 24645536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upper limb lymphedema 27 (ULL27): Dutch translation and validation of an illness-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with upper limb lymphedema.
Viehoff PB; van Genderen FR; Wittink H
Lymphology; 2008 Sep; 41(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 19013881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
