BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15560808)

  • 1. Bone level change at implant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function.
    Wennström J; Zurdo J; Karlsson S; Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl K; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1077-83. PubMed ID: 15560808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned implants supporting fixed partial dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study.
    Koutouzis T; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17608740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported fixed partial dentures in periodontitis-susceptible subjects. A 5-year prospective study.
    Wennström JL; Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl K; Karlsson S; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 31(9):713-24. PubMed ID: 15312092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers.
    Hälg GA; Schmid J; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):983-90. PubMed ID: 18828813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implant-supported fixed cantilever prosthesis in partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study.
    Romeo E; Tomasi C; Finini I; Casentini P; Lops D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1278-85. PubMed ID: 19709064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
    Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone alterations at implant-supported FDPs in relation to inter-unit distances: a 5-year radiographic study.
    Chang M; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):735-40. PubMed ID: 20384704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Sep; 32(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 16104954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function.
    Brägger U; Aeschlimann S; Bürgin W; Hämmerle CH; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 11168268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone level alterations at implants placed in the posterior segments of the dentition: outcome of submerged/non-submerged healing. A 5-year multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Cecchinato D; Bengazi F; Blasi G; Botticelli D; Cardarelli I; Gualini F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):429-31. PubMed ID: 18266872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
    Eliasson A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate loading of implants in the maxilla: survival and bone loss after at least 2 years in function.
    Vervaeke S; Collaert B; De Bruyn H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 23377068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of cantilevers on biological and technical success outcomes of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. A retrospective cohort study.
    Kim P; Ivanovski S; Latcham N; Mattheos N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 23281736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difference in marginal bone loss around implants between short implant-supported partial fixed prostheses with and without cantilever: a retrospective clinical study.
    Al-Kilani J; Al-Kilani S; Chrcanovic BR
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Dec; 9(1):46. PubMed ID: 38036796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal bone loss around implants supporting fixed restorations.
    Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Cekici A
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Oct; 37(5):549-58. PubMed ID: 20712440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of implant configurations supporting three-unit fixed partial denture on mandibular bone response: biological-data-based finite element study.
    Yoda N; Liao Z; Chen J; Sasaki K; Swain M; Li Q
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 43(9):692-701. PubMed ID: 27224022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-year prospective follow-up of implant/tooth-supported versus freestanding implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Dec; 28(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 19146055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peri-implant bone loss as a function of tooth-implant distance.
    Baron M; Haas R; Baron W; Mailath-Pokorny G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 16220810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peri-implant soft tissue and bone crest alterations at fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year prospective study.
    Chang M; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 20443804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review.
    Zurdo J; Romão C; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():59-66. PubMed ID: 19663951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.