BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15561596)

  • 21. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
    Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. 3D dose reconstruction for clinical evaluation of IMRT pretreatment verification with an EPID.
    van Zijtveld M; Dirkx ML; de Boer HC; Heijmen BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 17287039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dose calculation using megavoltage cone-beam CT.
    Morin O; Chen J; Aubin M; Gillis A; Aubry JF; Bose S; Chen H; Descovich M; Xia P; Pouliot J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(4):1201-10. PubMed ID: 17336221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A virtual-accelerator-based verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam treatment planning in clinical situations.
    Wieslander E; Knöös T
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Feb; 82(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 17222475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dosimetric evaluation of a Monte Carlo IMRT treatment planning system incorporating the MIMiC.
    Rassiah-Szegedi P; Fuss M; Sheikh-Bagheri D; Szegedi M; Stathakis S; Lancaster J; Papanikolaou N; Salter B
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6931-41. PubMed ID: 18029985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dosimetric discrepancies caused by differing MLC parameters for dynamic IMRT.
    Wasbø E; Valen H
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):405-15. PubMed ID: 18184995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical implementation of tangential field intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using sliding window technique and dosimetric comparison with 3D conformal therapy (3DCRT) in breast cancer.
    Selvaraj RN; Beriwal S; Pourarian RJ; Lalonde RJ; Chen A; Mehta K; Brunner G; Wagner KA; Yue NJ; Huq SM; Heron DE
    Med Dosim; 2007; 32(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 17980832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Constraints and dosage for prostate cancer patients treated with conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy].
    Chauvet I; Gaboriaud G; Pontvert D; Zefkili S; Giraud P; Rosenwald JC; Cosset JM
    Cancer Radiother; 2004 Dec; 8(6):337-51. PubMed ID: 15619378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Quality assurance of a virtual simulation software: application to IMAgo and SIMAgo (ISOgray)].
    Isambert A; Beaudré A; Ferreira I; Lefkopoulos D
    Cancer Radiother; 2007 Jun; 11(4):178-87. PubMed ID: 17418608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monte Carlo simulation of a medical linear accelerator for radiotherapy use.
    Serrano B; Hachem A; Franchisseur E; Hérault J; Marcié S; Costa A; Bensadoun RJ; Barthe J; Gérard JP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):506-9. PubMed ID: 16644964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of a Monte Carlo model for the Brainlab microMLC.
    Belec J; Patrocinio H; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):787-99. PubMed ID: 15798255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
    Krieger T; Sauer OA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dosimetry in translation total body irradiation technique: a computer treatment planning approach and an experimental study concerning lung sparing.
    Zabatis Ch; Koligliatis T; Xenofos S; Pistevou K; Psarakos K; Haritanti A; Beroukas K
    J BUON; 2008; 13(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18555474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dose compensation of the total body irradiation therapy.
    Lin JP; Chu TC; Liu MT
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2001 Nov; 55(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 11573795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A depth-sensing technique on 3D-printed compensator for total body irradiation patient measurement and treatment planning.
    Lee MY; Han B; Jenkins C; Xing L; Suh TS
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):6137. PubMed ID: 27806603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of the thickness of the compensator filter in radiation therapy using computational intelligence.
    Dehlaghi V; Taghipour M; Haghparast A; Roshani GH; Rezaei A; Shayesteh SP; Adineh-Vand A; Karimi GR
    Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 25498836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implementation of a three-dimensional compensation system based on computed tomography generated surface contours and tissue inhomogeneities.
    Jursinic PA; Podgorsak MB; Paliwal BR
    Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 8208210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Evaluation of compensator used in radiation therapy].
    Lin FJ; Cheng NT; Chen HH; Chen CS; Hsien WL; Leung WM
    Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1990 Jun; 13(2):104-17. PubMed ID: 2224603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation and quality control of a commercial 3-D dose compensator system.
    Paliwal BR; Podgorsak MB; Harari PM; Haney P; Jursinic PA
    Med Dosim; 1994; 19(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 7818759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A packed building-block compensator (TETRIS-RT) and feasibility for IMRT delivery.
    Nakagawa K; Fukuhara N; Kawakami H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2231-5. PubMed ID: 16121577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.