These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1556236)

  • 1. Use of telephone enquiries to a microbiology laboratory as a proxy measure of reporting efficiency.
    Phillips G; Senior BW; McEwan H
    J Clin Pathol; 1992 Mar; 45(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 1556236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory turnround time: closing the loop.
    Smellie WS; Galloway PJ; Johnston JI
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Apr; 48(4):372-5. PubMed ID: 7615860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of a medical microbiology service: a survey of laboratory users.
    Morgan MS
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Oct; 48(10):915-8. PubMed ID: 8537489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Specimen rejection in laboratory medicine: Necessary for patient safety?
    Dikmen ZG; Pinar A; Akbiyik F
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 26527231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standard methods in clinical microbiology.
    Bevan V
    Commun Dis Public Health; 1998 Mar; 1(1):67. PubMed ID: 9718848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audit of turn-around times in a microbiology laboratory.
    Rogers S; Bywater MJ; Reeves DS
    J Clin Pathol; 1991 Mar; 44(3):257-8. PubMed ID: 2013631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance in the mycobacteriology laboratory. Quality control, quality improvement, and proficiency testing.
    Woods GL; Ridderhof JC
    Clin Lab Med; 1996 Sep; 16(3):657-75. PubMed ID: 8866185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Enhanced quality in a hospital microbiology laboratory: from automation to clinical advice].
    García-Irure JJ; Sanchiz JR; Valcayo A; Astier P
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2002; 20(7):326-31. PubMed ID: 12236998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of an internal quality assessment scheme in a clinical bacteriology laboratory.
    Constantine CE; Amphlett M; Farrington M; Brown DF; Messer S; Rampling A; Warren RE
    J Clin Pathol; 1993 Nov; 46(11):1046-50. PubMed ID: 8254094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audit of turnaround times for processing Mycobacterium tuberculosis specimens in a district general hospital.
    Davies AP; Silles J; Patel BC
    Commun Dis Public Health; 2002 Jun; 5(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 12166303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A system to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: feasibility of a split-specimen design.
    Shahangian S; Krolak JM; Gaunt EE; Cohn RD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):503-11. PubMed ID: 9625417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The significance of policies relating to clinical laboratory specimens.
    Ogram D
    Can J Med Technol; 1991; 53(2):79-80. PubMed ID: 10112876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditing the implementation of standard methods.
    Djemal KK; Messer S
    Commun Dis Public Health; 1998 Mar; 1(1):68. PubMed ID: 9718849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Where is that specimen?
    Tribue VL; Haug AM; Straub ML; Cheng RA; Castellani W
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2011 Sep; 43(9):20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 21941995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Preanalytic Practices on Contamination and Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Cultures: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    LaRocco MT; Franek J; Leibach EK; Weissfeld AS; Kraft CS; Sautter RL; Baselski V; Rodahl D; Peterson EJ; Cornish NE
    Clin Microbiol Rev; 2016 Jan; 29(1):105-47. PubMed ID: 26598386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of intervention on the frequency with which leaky urine specimens are received in the laboratory.
    Doern GV; Vautour R
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Feb; 16(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 8467627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective study of quantitative aspects of audit in a large general histopathology laboratory.
    Thomas JS; Lessells AM; McIntyre MA; Klys HS; Webb JN
    J Clin Pathol; 1991 Nov; 44(11):928-31. PubMed ID: 1752984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating a workable specimen rejection policy.
    Richael JL; Naples MF
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1995 Mar; 27(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 10141480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations of paperless on-line reporting of diagnostic bacteriology culture results.
    Block C; Laloum J; Rajs A; Stalnikowicz R; Shapiro M
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Sep; 49(9):759-61. PubMed ID: 9038762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Archeological laboratory results or microbiology of the time?].
    Sundqvist M; Schön T; Serrander L
    Lakartidningen; 2011 Apr 13-19; 108(15):844-5. PubMed ID: 21674971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.