These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15562480)

  • 1. Gradient field switching as a source for artifacts in MR imaging of metallic stents.
    Shenhav A; Azhari H
    Magn Reson Med; 2004 Dec; 52(6):1465-8. PubMed ID: 15562480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Systematics of imaging artifacts in MRT caused by metallic vascular implants (stents)].
    Graf H; Klemm T; Lauer UA; Duda S; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1711-9. PubMed ID: 14661144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro assessment of 3-T MRI issues for a bioabsorbable, coronary artery scaffold with metallic markers.
    Shellock FG; Giangarra CJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 32(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24315524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety.
    Shellock FG; Shellock VJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):543-7. PubMed ID: 10470877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts.
    Bartels LW; Bakker CJ; Viergever MA
    Magn Reson Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):171-80. PubMed ID: 11754456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: A systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths.
    Klemm T; Duda S; Machann J; Seekamp-Rahn K; Schnieder L; Claussen CD; Schick F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Oct; 12(4):606-15. PubMed ID: 11042644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Susceptibility-based MR Imaging of Nitinol Stent
    Shi C; Wang H; Xie G; Su S; Huang Y; Chen H; Liu X; Zheng H; Liang D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5753-5756. PubMed ID: 31947159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronary arterial stents: safety and artifacts during MR imaging.
    Hug J; Nagel E; Bornstedt A; Schnackenburg B; Oswald H; Fleck E
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):781-7. PubMed ID: 10966711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Magnetic resonance imaging of stents: quantitative in vitro examination at 3 Tesla].
    Reinhardt J; Nguyen-Trong TH; Hähnel S; Bellemann ME; Heiland S
    Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(4):278-87. PubMed ID: 19995528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High flip angle imaging of metallic stents: implications for MR angiography and intraluminal signal interpretation.
    van Holten J; Wielopolski P; Brück E; Pattynama PM; van Dijk LC
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Oct; 50(4):879-83. PubMed ID: 14523976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Venous Stents at 1.5 T: Susceptibility Artifacts and Radiofrequency Shielding.
    Reiss S; Özen AC; Lottner T; Reichert A; Massmann A; Bock M
    Invest Radiol; 2020 Nov; 55(11):741-746. PubMed ID: 32604387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
    Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A next-generation, flow-diverting implant used to treat brain aneurysms: in vitro evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating and artifacts at 3-T.
    Karacozoff AM; Shellock FG; Wakhloo AK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jan; 31(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 22901731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study.
    Graf H; Lauer UA; Berger A; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 23(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 15862651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wallstent metallic biliary endoprosthesis: MR imaging characteristics.
    Girard MJ; Hahn PF; Saini S; Dawson SL; Goldberg MA; Mueller PR
    Radiology; 1992 Sep; 184(3):874-6. PubMed ID: 1509084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents.
    Bartels LW; Smits HF; Bakker CJ; Viergever MA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2001 Mar; 12(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 11287516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative assessment of biliary stent artifacts on MR images: Potential implications for target delineation in radiotherapy.
    Gurney-Champion OJ; Bruins Slot T; Lens E; van der Horst A; Klaassen R; van Laarhoven HW; van Tienhoven G; van Hooft JE; Nederveen AJ; Bel A
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5603. PubMed ID: 27782717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radio frequency versus susceptibility effects of small conductive implants--a systematic MRI study on aneurysm clips at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Lauer UA; Graf H; Berger A; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):563-9. PubMed ID: 15919602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR-imaging of the TMJ: artefacts caused by dental alloys.
    Behr M; Fellner C; Bayreuther G; Leibrock A; Held P; Fellner F; Handel G
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Sep; 4(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 9171016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.
    Lee KY; Slavinsky JP; Ries MD; Blumenkrantz G; Majumdar S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Feb; 21(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 15666404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.