These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15563297)

  • 1. Reactions to genetically modified food crops and how perception of risks and benefits influences consumers' information gathering.
    Wilson C; Evans G; Leppard P; Syrette J
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1311-21. PubMed ID: 15563297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.
    Gaskell G; Allum N; Wagner W; Kronberger N; Torgersen H; Hampel J; Bardes J
    Risk Anal; 2004 Feb; 24(1):185-94. PubMed ID: 15028010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumer perception of risk associated with eating genetically engineered soybeans is less in the presence of a perceived consumer benefit.
    Brown JL; Ping Y
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Feb; 103(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 12589328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology.
    Savadori L; Savio S; Nicotra E; Rumiati R; Finucane M; Slovic P
    Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1289-99. PubMed ID: 15563295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explaining public resistance to genetically modified corn: an analysis of the distribution of benefits and risks.
    Wu F
    Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):715-26. PubMed ID: 15209940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public health issues related with the consumption of food obtained from genetically modified organisms.
    Paparini A; Romano-Spica V
    Biotechnol Annu Rev; 2004; 10():85-122. PubMed ID: 15504704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hot potato: expert-consumer differences in the perception of a second-generation novel food.
    Hagemann KS; Scholderer J
    Risk Anal; 2009 Jul; 29(7):1041-55. PubMed ID: 19392674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information.
    Verbeke W; Frewer LJ; Scholderer J; De Brabander HF
    Anal Chim Acta; 2007 Mar; 586(1-2):2-7. PubMed ID: 17386689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
    Teng PP
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China.
    Huang J; Qiu H; Bai J; Pray C
    Appetite; 2006 Mar; 46(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16469414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States.
    Lang JT; Hallman WK
    Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1241-52. PubMed ID: 16297228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risks of allergic reactions to biotech proteins in foods: perception and reality.
    Lehrer SB; Bannon GA
    Allergy; 2005 May; 60(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 15813800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological and biomedical aspects of genetically modified food.
    Celec P; Kukucková M; Renczésová V; Natarajan S; Pálffy R; Gardlík R; Hodosy J; Behuliak M; Vlková B; Minárik G; Szemes T; Stuchlík S; Turna J
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2005 Dec; 59(10):531-40. PubMed ID: 16298508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk assessment of genetically modified crops for nutrition and health.
    Magaña-Gómez JA; de la Barca AM
    Nutr Rev; 2009 Jan; 67(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19146501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops--what makes sense?
    Goodman RE; Vieths S; Sampson HA; Hill D; Ebisawa M; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18183024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acceptance of genetically modified foods: the relation between technology and evaluation.
    Tenbült P; De Vries NK; van Breukelen G; Dreezens E; Martijn C
    Appetite; 2008 Jul; 51(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 18336952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature.
    Finucane ML; Holup JL
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1603-12. PubMed ID: 15652691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A risk-based classification scheme for genetically modified foods. I: Conceptual development.
    Chao E; Krewski D
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 52(3):208-22. PubMed ID: 18778747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attitudes, perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda.
    Kikulwe EM; Wesseler J; Falck-Zepeda J
    Appetite; 2011 Oct; 57(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 21704665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.