303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15564189)
1. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds.
Singh A; Halder S; Menon GR; Chumber S; Misra MC; Sharma LK; Srivastava A
Asian J Surg; 2004 Oct; 27(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15564189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cost-effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline-gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study.
Ohlsson P; Larsson K; Lindholm C; Möller M
Scand J Prim Health Care; 1994 Dec; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 7863149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.
Hermans MH
Int J Sports Med; 1991 Dec; 12(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 1797702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modelling the cost implications of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention in the US and UK.
Guest JF; Ruiz FJ
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 15801999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group.
Hansson C
Int J Dermatol; 1998 May; 37(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 9620490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective evaluation of occlusive hydrocolloid dressing versus conventional gauze dressing regarding the healing effect after abdominal operations: randomized controlled trial.
Shinohara T; Yamashita Y; Satoh K; Mikami K; Yamauchi Y; Hoshino S; Noritomi A; Maekawa T
Asian J Surg; 2008 Jan; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18334461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of three new hydrocolloid dressings: retention of dressing integrity and biodegradability of absorbent components attenuate inflammation.
Chakravarthy D; Rodway N; Schmidt S; Smith D; Evancho M; Sims R
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Oct; 28(10):1165-73. PubMed ID: 7530252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occlusive dressing versus petroleum gauze on drainage wounds.
Alsbjörn BF; Ovesen H; Walther-Larsen S
Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Mar; 156(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 2336914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparison of a new, synthetic donor site dressing versus an impregnated gauze dressing.
Hickerson WL; Kealey GP; Smith DJ; Thomson PD
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1994; 15(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 7929519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. OUTCOME OF FOAM VERSUS GAUZE DRESSINGS IN NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE TRAUMATIC WOUNDS WITH SOFT TISSUE LOSS AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
Ondieki JG; Khainga SO; Owilla F; Nangole FW
East Afr Med J; 2012 Jul; 89(7):230-40. PubMed ID: 26845802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of moist dressings in wound healing after surgical suturing: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Sun W; Chen M; Duan D; Liu W; Cui W; Li L
Int Wound J; 2023 Jan; 20(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 35546485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs.
Agren MS; Mertz PM; Franzén L
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Jan; 36(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8996261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of three wound dressings on infection, healing comfort, and cost in patients with sternotomy wounds: a randomized trial.
Wynne R; Botti M; Stedman H; Holsworth L; Harinos M; Flavell O; Manterfield C
Chest; 2004 Jan; 125(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 14718419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a Hydrocolloid Dressing in the Prevention of Device-related Pressure Ulcers During Noninvasive Ventilation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Cai JY; Zha ML; Chen HL
Wound Manag Prev; 2019 Feb; 65(2):30-38. PubMed ID: 30730303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do patient and nurse outcome differences exist between 2 negative pressure wound therapy systems?
Albert NM; Rock R; Sammon MA; Bena JF; Morrison SL; Whitman A; Kato I; Landis-Erdman JC
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 22552107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
