These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15565046)
1. Advancing justice for sexual assault survivors and innocent inmates, or threat to privacy? A controversial DNA technology proposal. Hackenschmidt A J Emerg Nurs; 2004 Dec; 30(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15565046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets. Will JF Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2003; 65(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15568272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Crime and punishment. Opar A Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Biology and justice]. Nadal JL J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 15005511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice. Juengst ET Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA evidence in rape cases and the Debbie Smith Act: forensic practice and criminal justice implications. Telsavaara TV; Arrigo BA Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Oct; 50(5):487-505. PubMed ID: 16943376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California. Nerko CJ Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 77(2):917-49. PubMed ID: 19353834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Think-tank calls for an end to DNA deception. Adam D Nature; 2002 May; 417(6887):370. PubMed ID: 12024182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The physician as gatekeeper to the use of genetic information in the criminal justice system. Seiden SC; Morin K; J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 11905274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector. Lakra R; Dimitriadis F Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Legislation Mandating DNA Testing in Sexual Assault Cases: Results in Texas. Davis RC; Auchter B; Wells W; Camp T; Howley S Violence Against Women; 2020 Apr; 26(5):417-437. PubMed ID: 30971179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dangerous excursions: the case against expanding forensic DNA databases to innocent persons. Simoncelli T J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 16789961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A database of the innocent? Bingham R Splice Life; 2001; 7(2-3):8-9. PubMed ID: 12564461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The railway murders: R v John Duffy and R v David Mulcahy. Bolland L Med Sci Law; 2002 Jan; 42(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 11848136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science & justice--DNA and the courts. Sedley S Sci Justice; 2005; 45(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 16080318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention of offender DNA samples necessary to ensure and monitor quality of forensic DNA efforts: appropriate safeguards exist to protect the DNA samples from misuse. Herkenham MD J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 16789959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment. Kimel CW Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Have the police hijacked our DNA? Lancet; 2003 Sep; 362(9388):927. PubMed ID: 14511920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forgotten evidence: A mixed methods study of why sexual assault kits (SAKs) are not submitted for DNA forensic testing. Campbell R; Fehler-Cabral G; Bybee D; Shaw J Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):454-467. PubMed ID: 28661168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The (in)significance of genital injury in rape and sexual assault. Walker G J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Aug; 34():173-8. PubMed ID: 26165680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]