136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15565046)
1. Advancing justice for sexual assault survivors and innocent inmates, or threat to privacy? A controversial DNA technology proposal.
Hackenschmidt A
J Emerg Nurs; 2004 Dec; 30(6):575-7. PubMed ID: 15565046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets.
Will JF
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2003; 65(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15568272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Crime and punishment.
Opar A
Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Biology and justice].
Nadal JL
J Soc Biol; 2003; 197(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 15005511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
Juengst ET
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA evidence in rape cases and the Debbie Smith Act: forensic practice and criminal justice implications.
Telsavaara TV; Arrigo BA
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Oct; 50(5):487-505. PubMed ID: 16943376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California.
Nerko CJ
Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 77(2):917-49. PubMed ID: 19353834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Think-tank calls for an end to DNA deception.
Adam D
Nature; 2002 May; 417(6887):370. PubMed ID: 12024182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The physician as gatekeeper to the use of genetic information in the criminal justice system.
Seiden SC; Morin K;
J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 11905274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector.
Lakra R; Dimitriadis F
Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effects of Legislation Mandating DNA Testing in Sexual Assault Cases: Results in Texas.
Davis RC; Auchter B; Wells W; Camp T; Howley S
Violence Against Women; 2020 Apr; 26(5):417-437. PubMed ID: 30971179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dangerous excursions: the case against expanding forensic DNA databases to innocent persons.
Simoncelli T
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 16789961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A database of the innocent?
Bingham R
Splice Life; 2001; 7(2-3):8-9. PubMed ID: 12564461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The railway murders: R v John Duffy and R v David Mulcahy.
Bolland L
Med Sci Law; 2002 Jan; 42(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 11848136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Science & justice--DNA and the courts.
Sedley S
Sci Justice; 2005; 45(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 16080318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Retention of offender DNA samples necessary to ensure and monitor quality of forensic DNA efforts: appropriate safeguards exist to protect the DNA samples from misuse.
Herkenham MD
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 16789959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment.
Kimel CW
Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Have the police hijacked our DNA?
Lancet; 2003 Sep; 362(9388):927. PubMed ID: 14511920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forgotten evidence: A mixed methods study of why sexual assault kits (SAKs) are not submitted for DNA forensic testing.
Campbell R; Fehler-Cabral G; Bybee D; Shaw J
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):454-467. PubMed ID: 28661168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The (in)significance of genital injury in rape and sexual assault.
Walker G
J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Aug; 34():173-8. PubMed ID: 26165680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
