These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15565174)

  • 1. Evaluation of the A&D UA-767 and Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs noninvasive blood pressure monitors using a blood pressure simulator.
    Davis PD; Dennis JL; Railton R
    J Hum Hypertens; 2005 Mar; 19(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 15565174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
    Jones CR; Taylor K; Poston L; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Mar; 15(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11317204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' blood pressure measurement device in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.
    Reinders A; Cuckson AC; Jones CR; Poet R; O'Sullivan G; Shennan AH
    BJOG; 2003 Feb; 110(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12618156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated noninvasive blood pressure measurement.
    Ng KG
    Intensive Care World; 1995 Sep; 12(3):89-102. PubMed ID: 10157893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN; Scott DH
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs blood pressure device according to the ANSI/AAMI SP10: 2002. Accuracy and cost-efficiency successfully combined.
    Alpert BS
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):345-7. PubMed ID: 17890975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
    Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Welch Allyn SureBP (inflation) and StepBP (deflation) algorithms by AAMI standard testing and BHS data analysis.
    Alpert BS
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Apr; 16(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 21412074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of the Colson MAM BP 3AA1-2 automatic blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension validation protocol.
    Pereira T; Maldonado J
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2005 Nov; 24(11):1341-51. PubMed ID: 16463984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
    Viera AJ; Hinderliter AL
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 17890973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Oregon scientific BPW810 blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension Protocol.
    Li L; Hui W; Jin Lan W
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Dec; 11(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 17106319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the SCHILLER BR-102 plus noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the International Protocol introduced by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Denchev SV; Simova II; Matveev MG
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 17890972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of the Welch Allyn ProBP 3400: a device for modern medical practice.
    Alpert BS
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Jun; 16(3):156-8. PubMed ID: 21527848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.