These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15565561)
1. Age-standardisation when target setting and auditing performance of Down syndrome screening programmes. Cuckle H; Aitken D; Goodburn S; Senior B; Spencer K; Standing S; Prenat Diagn; 2004 Nov; 24(11):851-6. PubMed ID: 15565561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting the result of additional second-trimester markers from a woman's first-trimester marker profile: a new concept in Down syndrome screening. Maymon R; Cuckle H; Jones R; Reish O; Sharony R; Herman A Prenat Diagn; 2005 Dec; 25(12):1102-6. PubMed ID: 16231324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Down syndrome screening in the first and/or second trimester: model predicted performance using meta-analysis parameters. Cuckle H; Benn P; Wright D Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 29(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 16104677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contingent screening for Down syndrome is an efficient alternative to non-disclosure sequential screening. Wright D; Bradbury I; Benn P; Cuckle H; Ritchie K Prenat Diagn; 2004 Oct; 24(10):762-6. PubMed ID: 15503281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect on Down syndrome screening performance of adjusting for marker levels in a previous pregnancy. Wald NJ; Barnes IM; Birger R; Huttly W Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jun; 26(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 16634123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First- and second-trimester screening: detection of aneuploidies other than Down syndrome. Breathnach FM; Malone FD; Lambert-Messerlian G; Cuckle HS; Porter TF; Nyberg DA; Comstock CH; Saade GR; Berkowitz RL; Klugman S; Dugoff L; Craigo SD; Timor-Tritsch IE; Carr SR; Wolfe HM; Tripp T; Bianchi DW; D'Alton ME; Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 17766613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of bias in MoM values on patient risk and screening performance for Down syndrome. Nix B; Wright D; Baker A Prenat Diagn; 2007 Sep; 27(9):840-5. PubMed ID: 17600858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening. Nicolaides KH; Spencer K; Avgidou K; Faiola S; Falcon O Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 15736186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing three screening strategies for combining first- and second-trimester Down syndrome markers. Palomaki GE; Steinort K; Knight GJ; Haddow JE Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):367-75. PubMed ID: 16449126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population. Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialard F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16723105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining first and second trimester markers for Down syndrome screening: think twice. Cocciolone R; Brameld K; O'Leary P; Haan E; Muller P; Shand K Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):492-500. PubMed ID: 19032666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population]. Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialat F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 17350315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]