These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
862 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15566337)
1. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002. Linton A; Peterson MR Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002. Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 15738031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of maternal characteristics on cesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002. Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV Birth; 2004 Mar; 31(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15015987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TRICARE senior demonstration of military managed care--DOD. Notice of demonstration project. Fed Regist; 1998 Jul; 63(137):38558-9. PubMed ID: 10181251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cesarean section rates in fee-for-service versus managed care patients in the Ohio Medicaid population, 1992-1997. Koroukian SM; Bush D; Rimm AA Am J Manag Care; 2001 Feb; 7(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 11216331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of six clinical preventive services in TRICARE Prime compared to insured, managed care, and all U.S. populations and Healthy People 2010. Brown DS; Kurlantzick VG; McCall NT; Williams TV; Gantt CJ; Granger E Prev Med; 2009 Apr; 48(4):389-91. PubMed ID: 19254744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont. Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Managed care market share and cesarean section rates in the United States: is there a link? Hueston WJ; Sutton A Am J Manag Care; 2000 Nov; 6(11):1202-8. PubMed ID: 11185845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Childbearing in U.S. military hospitals: dimensions of care affecting women's perceptions of quality and satisfaction. Harriott EM; Williams TV; Peterson MR Birth; 2005 Mar; 32(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 15725199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service? Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart? Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data. DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety? Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment failure rates and health care utilization and costs among patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with levofloxacin or macrolides in an outpatient setting: a retrospective claims database analysis. Ye X; Sikirica V; Schein JR; Grant R; Zarotsky V; Doshi D; Benson CJ; Riedel AA Clin Ther; 2008 Feb; 30(2):358-71. PubMed ID: 18343274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Jordanian cesarean section rate. Hindawi IM; Meri ZB Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients' knowledge of health plan coverage and satisfaction with care. Tucker JL Am J Manag Care; 2001 May; 7(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 11388125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation of Caesarean sections in three Greek hospitals: the impact of financial incentives and convenience. Mossialos E; Allin S; Karras K; Davaki K Eur J Public Health; 2005 Jun; 15(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 15923214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress. Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth. Soliman SR; Burrows RF CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]