These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15566340)

  • 1. Physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery.
    Ghetti C; Chan BK; Guise JM
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 15566340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.
    Wax JR; Cartin A; Pinette MG; Blackstone J
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 16128974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.
    Kalish RB; McCullough L; Gupta M; Thaler HT; Chervenak FA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1137-41. PubMed ID: 15172844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns.
    Bettes BA; Coleman VH; Zinberg S; Spong CY; Portnoy B; DeVoto E; Schulkin J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 109(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 17197588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say.
    Finsen V; Storeheier AH; Aasland OG
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 18507582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
    Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient satisfaction with the prenatal care provider and the risk of cesarean delivery.
    Cohen JR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):2029-32; discussion 2032-4. PubMed ID: 15970886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Obstetrician gender and the likelihood of performing a maternal request for a cesarean delivery.
    Liu TC; Lin HC; Chen CS; Lee HC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jan; 136(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 17383794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current practice of cesarean delivery on maternal request following the 2006 state-of-the-science conference.
    Coleman-Cowger VH; Erickson K; Spong CY; Portnoy B; Croswell J; Schulkin J
    J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 20337204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstetric decision-making: responses to patients who request cesarean delivery.
    Johnson SR; Elkins TE; Strong C; Phelan JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 67(6):847-50. PubMed ID: 3703409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation?
    Fuglenes D; Oian P; Kristiansen IS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 200(1):48.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18973870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk-adjusted cesarean rates: what risk factors for cesarean delivery are important to practicing obstetricians?
    Bailit JL; Schulkin J; Dawson NV
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Mar; 52(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 17465286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeat cesarean section and primary elective cesarean section: recently trained obstetrician-gynecologist practice patterns and opinions.
    Kenton K; Brincat C; Mutone M; Brubaker L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1872-5; discussion 1875-6. PubMed ID: 15970836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Caesarean or normal vaginal delivery: overview of physicians' self-preference and suggestion to patients.
    Hantoushzadeh S; Rajabzadeh A; Saadati A; Mahdanian A; Ashrafinia N; Khazardoost S; Borna S; Maleki M; Shariat M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19052758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan.
    Xirasagar S; Lin HC; Liu TC
    Health Policy Plan; 2006 Jul; 21(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 16790455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary and preventive healthcare in obstetrics and gynecology: a study of practice patterns in the mid-atlantic region.
    Stovall DW; Loveless MB; Walden NA; Karjane N; Cohen SA
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 17324104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Caesarean section on request: a survey in The Netherlands.
    Kwee A; Cohlen BJ; Kanhai HH; Bruinse HW; Visser GH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Apr; 113(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 15063958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches.
    Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia.
    Robson SJ; Tan WS; Adeyemi A; Dear KB
    Birth; 2009 Sep; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 19747267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do physicians and their relatives have a decreased rate of cesarean section? A 4-year population-based study in Taiwan.
    Chou YJ; Huang N; Lin IF; Deng CY; Tsai YW; Chen LS; Lee CH
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 16948719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.