86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15567321)
1. Handling of computational in vitro/in vivo correlation problems by Microsoft Excel: IV. Generalized matrix analysis of linear compartment systems.
Langenbucher F
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2005 Jan; 59(1):229-35. PubMed ID: 15567321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Handling of computational in vitro/in vivo correlation problems by Microsoft Excel: I. Principles and some general algorithms.
Langenbucher F
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2002 Jan; 53(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11777746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Handling of computational in vitro/in vivo correlation problems by Microsoft Excel: V. Predictive absorbability models.
Langenbucher F
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2007 Aug; 67(1):293-9. PubMed ID: 17363230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SCEW: a Microsoft Excel add-in for easy creation of survival curves.
Khan HA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jul; 83(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 16777258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Handling of computational in vitro/in vivo correlation problems by Microsoft Excel: III. Convolution and deconvolution.
Langenbucher F
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2003 Nov; 56(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 14602187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Handling of computational in vitro/in vivo correlation problems by Microsoft Excel II. Distribution functions and moments.
Langenbucher F
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2003 Jan; 55(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 12551707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which linear compartmental systems can be analyzed by spectral analysis of PET output data summed over all compartments?
Schmidt K
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1999 May; 19(5):560-9. PubMed ID: 10326723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mathematical properties and parameter estimation for transit compartment pharmacodynamic models.
Yates JW
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2008 Jul; 34(2-3):104-9. PubMed ID: 18406113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An investigation into the usefulness of generalized regression neural network analysis in the development of level A in vitro-in vivo correlation.
Parojcić J; Ibrić S; Djurić Z; Jovanović M; Corrigan OI
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2007 Mar; 30(3-4):264-72. PubMed ID: 17188851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [DNAStat, version 1.2 -- a software package for processing genetic profile databases and biostatistical calculations].
Berent J
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 17907628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating model fit for growth curve models: Integration of fit indices from SEM and MLM frameworks.
Wu W; West SG; Taylor AB
Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):183-201. PubMed ID: 19719357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters from non-compartmental variables using Microsoft Excel.
Dansirikul C; Choi M; Duffull SB
Comput Biol Med; 2005 Jun; 35(5):389-403. PubMed ID: 15767115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pairwise fitting of mixed models for the joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal profiles.
Fieuws S; Verbeke G
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):424-31. PubMed ID: 16918906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multilevel modelling: Beyond the basic applications.
Wright DB; London K
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):439-56. PubMed ID: 18664317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of fitness distance correlation as a difficulty measure in genetic programming.
Tomassini M; Vanneschi L; Collard P; Clergue M
Evol Comput; 2005; 13(2):213-39. PubMed ID: 15969901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating the polychoric correlation from misclassified data.
Yiu CF; Poon WY
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):49-74. PubMed ID: 18482475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EXAMINE: a computational approach to reconstructing gene regulatory networks.
Deng X; Geng H; Ali H
Biosystems; 2005 Aug; 81(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 15951103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical inference in generalized linear mixed models: a review.
Tuerlinckx F; Rijmen F; Verbeke G; De Boeck P
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):225-55. PubMed ID: 17067411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial construct validation of frequently employed ANAM measures through structural equation modeling.
Short P; Cernich A; Wilken JA; Kane RL
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22 Suppl 1():S63-77. PubMed ID: 17145163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Module networks revisited: computational assessment and prioritization of model predictions.
Joshi A; De Smet R; Marchal K; Van de Peer Y; Michoel T
Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 25(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 19136553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
