BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15567533)

  • 1. The effect on anterior column loading due to different vertebral augmentation techniques.
    Ananthakrishnan D; Berven S; Deviren V; Cheng K; Lotz JC; Xu Z; Puttlitz CM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jan; 20(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15567533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect on anterior column loading due to different vertebral augmentation techniques.
    Polikeit A; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jun; 20(5):551-2; author reply 522. PubMed ID: 15836944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is kyphoplasty better than vertebroplasty in restoring normal mechanical function to an injured spine?
    Luo J; Bertram W; Sangar D; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
    Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1050-7. PubMed ID: 20004264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kyphoplasty reduction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: correction of local kyphosis versus overall sagittal alignment.
    Pradhan BB; Bae HW; Kropf MA; Patel VV; Delamarter RB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 16481954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of bone mineral density after percutaneous kyphoplasty in fresh osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and adjacent vertebrae along with sagittal spine alignment.
    Korovessis P; Zacharatos S; Repantis T; Michael A; Karachalios D
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 18525491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
    Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
    Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary outcomes and efficacy of the first 360 consecutive kyphoplasties for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
    Majd ME; Farley S; Holt RT
    Spine J; 2005; 5(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 15863078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic vertebral reinforcement adjacent to vertebroplasty under cyclic loading.
    Oakland RJ; Furtado NR; Wilcox RK; Timothy J; Hall RM
    Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 18640876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The mechanics of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
    Kayanja M; Evans K; Milks R; Lieberman IH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Feb; 443():124-30. PubMed ID: 16462435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical performance of the new BeadEx implant in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: restoration and maintenance of height and stability.
    Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Shezifi Y; Ohana N; Ben-Arye A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):676-82. PubMed ID: 16567025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjacent level load transfer following vertebral augmentation in the cadaveric spine.
    Kayanja MM; Evans K; Milks R; Lieberman IH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):E790-7. PubMed ID: 17023840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Vertebral reinforcement by means of kyphoplasty in the treatment of non-osteoporotic thoraco-lumbar fractures. Study of 40 cases and review of the literature].
    Arregui R; Martínez-Quiñones JV; Aso-Escario J; Aso-Vizan J
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2008 Dec; 19(6):537-50. PubMed ID: 19112547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Kyphoplasty for treatment of non-osteoporotic thoracolumbar compressive fractures: analysis of 17 cases].
    Hai Y; Chen XM; Wu JG; Liu YZ; Zhou LJ; Zou DW
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 86(43):3035-8. PubMed ID: 17288830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical efficacy of vertebroplasty: influence of cement type, BMD, fracture severity, and disc degeneration.
    Luo J; Skrzypiec DM; Pollintine P; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
    Bone; 2007 Apr; 40(4):1110-9. PubMed ID: 17229596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical study on one side approach percutaneous kyphoplasty treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].
    Wang J; Zhang N; Liu J; Tian H; Chen C
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 23(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 19192883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical assessment of stability in the metastatic spine following percutaneous vertebroplasty: effects of cement distribution patterns and volume.
    Tschirhart CE; Roth SE; Whyne CM
    J Biomech; 2005 Aug; 38(8):1582-90. PubMed ID: 15958214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determination of painful vertebrae treated by kyphoplasty in multiple-level vertebral compression fractures].
    Yang HL; Wang GL; Niu GQ; Meng B; Chen L; Zheng ZM; Tang TS
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan; 46(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 18509999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty--treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures].
    Vcelák J; Tóth L; Slégl M; Suman R; Majernícek M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb; 76(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 19268050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How are adjacent spinal levels affected by vertebral fracture and by vertebroplasty? A biomechanical study on cadaveric spines.
    Luo J; Annesley-Williams DJ; Adams MA; Dolan P
    Spine J; 2017 Jun; 17(6):863-874. PubMed ID: 28167249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeat vertebroplasty for unrelieved pain at previously treated vertebral levels with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
    He SC; Teng GJ; Deng G; Fang W; Guo JH; Zhu GY; Li GZ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):640-7. PubMed ID: 18344858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.