These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15567539)

  • 1. A biomechanical study comparing cortical onlay allograft struts and plates in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Wilson D; Frei H; Masri BA; Oxland TR; Duncan CP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jan; 20(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15567539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques.
    Dennis MG; Simon JA; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ; DiCesare PE
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 10884215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cable plates and onlay allografts in periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip replacement: laboratory and clinical observations.
    Howell JR; Masri BA; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV; Duncan CP
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():99-110. PubMed ID: 15116604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical onlay allograft struts in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
    Haddad FS; Duncan CP
    Instr Course Lect; 2003; 52():291-300. PubMed ID: 12690857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate.
    Haddad FS; Duncan CP; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG; Gross AE; Chandler HP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):945-50. PubMed ID: 12063328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
    Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
    J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Plate-screw-wiring technique for the treatment of periprosthetic fracture around the hip: a biomechanical study.
    Kuptniratsaikul S; Brohmwitak C; Techapongvarachai T; Itiravivong P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S415-22. PubMed ID: 11529368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical comparison of two techniques.
    Dennis MG; Simon JA; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ; Di Cesare PE
    J Orthop Trauma; 2001; 15(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11265007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical study.
    Mueller KL; Karunakar MA; Frankenburg EP; Scott DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jul; (412):189-95. PubMed ID: 12838071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Locking compression plate fixation for periprosthetic femoral fracture].
    Frankie L; Xiang Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Mar; 16(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 11944519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques.
    Blair B; Koval KJ; Kummer F; Zuckerman JD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Sep; (306):256-63. PubMed ID: 8070205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.
    Tencer AF; Johnson KD; Johnston DW; Gill K
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 6491820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical determination of the optimal number of fixation screws for the sliding hip screw plate.
    Reich SM; Jaffe WL; Kummer FJ
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1993-1995; 53(4):43-4. PubMed ID: 8829595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures: a biomechanical analysis comparing cortical strut allograft plates and conventional metal plates.
    Peters CL; Bachus KN; Davitt JS
    Orthopedics; 2003 Jul; 26(7):695-9. PubMed ID: 12875564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Internal fixation of radial neck fractures: an in vitro biomechanical analysis.
    Giffin JR; King GJ; Patterson SD; Johnson JA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):358-61. PubMed ID: 15109755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical testing of a computationally optimized far cortical locking plate versus traditional implants for distal femur fracture repair.
    Brzozowski P; Inculet C; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2024 Jul; 117():106296. PubMed ID: 38936291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supracondylar femur fracture fixation: mechanical comparison of the 95 degrees condylar side plate and screw versus 95 degrees angled blade plate.
    Jaakkola JI; Lundy DW; Moore T; Jones B; Ganey TM; Hutton WC
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Jan; 73(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11928916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Construct stiffness of different fixation methods for supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee prostheses.
    Cusick RP; Lucas GL; McQueen DA; Graber CD
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2000 Sep; 29(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 11008866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Exploration of the treatment for the periprosthetic femoral fractures].
    Zha ZG; Lin HS; Ekkernkamp A
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2004 Jan; 24(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 14724109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of transverse acetabular fracture fixation.
    Shazar N; Brumback RJ; Novak VP; Belkoff SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jul; (352):215-22. PubMed ID: 9678050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.