241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15567605)
1. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab.
Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Aug; 191(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 20558202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
He S; Abbas PJ; Doyle DV; McFayden TC; Mulherin S
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):397-411. PubMed ID: 26655913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibres to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation.
Hartmann R; Klinke R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():128-34. PubMed ID: 2162619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.
Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Nourski KV; Hu N; Robinson BK
Hear Res; 2003 Jan; 175(1-2):200-14. PubMed ID: 12527139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Rubinstein JT
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
Botros A; van Dijk B; Killian M
Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials.
van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; van Zanten GA
Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 17062500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
Clay KM; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants.
Smit JE; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 19464523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Further prospective findings with compound action potentials from Nucleus 24 cochlear implants.
Polak M; Hodges AV; King JE; Balkany TJ
Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 188(1-2):104-16. PubMed ID: 14759574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
Causon A; O'Driscoll M; Stapleton E; Lloyd S; Freeman S; Munro KJ
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude.
Westen AA; Dekker DM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):166-76. PubMed ID: 21664959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
