These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15568009)
1. [Evaluation of optimized injection dose and acquisition time using body mass index for three-dimensional whole-body FDG-PET]. Matsumoto K; Matsuura H; Minota E; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Senda M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Nov; 60(11):1564-73. PubMed ID: 15568009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner. Lodge MA; Badawi RD; Gilbert R; Dibos PE; Line BR J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 16391183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retro-orbital injection is an effective route for radiopharmaceutical administration in mice during small-animal PET studies. Nanni C; Pettinato C; Ambrosini V; Spinelli A; Trespidi S; Rubello D; Al-Nahhas A; Franchi R; Alavi A; Fanti S Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Jul; 28(7):547-53. PubMed ID: 17538396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging. Akamatsu G; Ikari Y; Nishio T; Nishida H; Ohnishi A; Aita K; Sasaki M; Sasaki M; Senda M Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET. El Fakhri G; Santos PA; Badawi RD; Holdsworth CH; Van Den Abbeele AD; Kijewski MF J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SUV correction for injection errors in FDG-PET examination. Miyashita K; Takahashi N; Oka T; Asakawa S; Lee J; Shizukuishi K; Inoue T Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 21(10):607-13. PubMed ID: 18092139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visualization of small brain nuclei with a high-spatial resolution, clinically available whole-body PET scanner. Shinohara Y; Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 38(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 37989801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The assessment of time-of-flight on image quality and quantification with reduced administered activity and scan times in 18F-FDG PET. Armstrong IS; James JM; Williams HA; Kelly MD; Matthews JC Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jul; 36(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 25757197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Usefulness of Determining Acquisition Time by True Count Rate Measurement Method for Delivery 18F-FDG PET/CT]. Miura S; Odashima S Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Mar; 72(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 27000670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simulated Reduced-Count Whole-Body FDG PET: Evaluation in Children and Young Adults Imaged on a Digital PET Scanner. Alves VPV; Brady S; Ata NA; Li Y; MacLean J; Zhang B; Sharp SE; Trout AT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Dec; 219(6):952-961. PubMed ID: 35731102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Examination of bed overlaps in 18F-FDG PET/CT 3D data acquisition]. Shishido H; Otsuka N; Tominaga T Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jun; 62(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 16799414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study. Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of potentially influential factors for positron emission tomography image quality in liver signal-to-noise ratio utilizing a delivery ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose study on Bi₄Ge₃O₁₂-positron emission tomography/computed tomography]. Kangai Y; Onishi H; Takigawa A; Yoshikawa K; Sanai H; Mimura H; Yanagimoto S Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Aug; 70(8):784-92. PubMed ID: 25142389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time. Brown C; Dempsey MF; Gillen G; Elliott AT Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20032801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]