368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15568273)
1. Roe v. Wade and the common law: denying the blessings of liberty to our posterity.
Roden GJ
Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 2003; 35():212-96. PubMed ID: 15568273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two ships passing in the night: an interpretavist review of the White-Stevens colloquy on Roe v. Wade.
Horan DJ; Forsythe CD; Grant ER
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1987; 6(2):229-311. PubMed ID: 16086461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Witherspoon JS
St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Unborn children as constitutional persons.
Roden GJ
Issues Law Med; 2010; 25(3):185-273. PubMed ID: 20443281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states.
Bradford CS
Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Donohue lecture series: "Roe v. Wade: past and future".
Weddington S
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1990; 24(3):601-20. PubMed ID: 16047442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
Lucas R
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
Parness JA
West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and the right of privacy.
Ortega ML
Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The law of tortious prenatal death since Roe v. Wade.
Kader D
Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(4):639-66. PubMed ID: 11658350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The constitutional morality of abortion.
Brownstein A; Dau P
Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to abortion: expansion of the right to privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Goldenberg D
Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):36-57. PubMed ID: 11663414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
Martyn K
UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
Henry KS
Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
Coleman JJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.
Bourne RW
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Graines S; Wyatt J
Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
Kindregan CP
Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
