These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15568274)

  • 1. I teach you the superman: why Congress cannot constitutionally prohibit genetic modification.
    Glahn JC
    Whittier Law Rev; 2003; 25(2):409-39. PubMed ID: 15568274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does the Thirteenth Amendment provide a jurisdictional basis for a federal ban on cloning?
    Vinck SC
    J Legis; 2003; 30(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17256218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
    Shapiro AA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The outer limits of human genetic engineering: a constitutional examination of parents' procreative liberty to genetically enhance their offspring.
    Patterson TS
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1999; 26(4):913-33. PubMed ID: 14627050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The children of ART (assisted reproductive technology): should the law protect them from harm?
    Rosato JL
    Utah Law Rev; 2004; 2004(1):57-110. PubMed ID: 16755703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlling the reproductive rights of impoverished women: is this the way to "reform" welfare?
    Broomfield MG
    Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1996; 16(2):217-44. PubMed ID: 16086512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inconsistent government policies: why FDA off-label regulation cannot survive First Amendment review under Greater New Orleans.
    Hall RF; Sobotka E
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 17444025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cloning human beings and the consumer of the future: a worthwhile endeavor or a nightmare come true?
    Frankel A
    Loyola Consum Law Rev; 2001; 13(2):149-87. PubMed ID: 15977332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Truth in testing laws: a shot in the arm for designer gene tests.
    van Voorhees A
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2006; 16(2):797-829. PubMed ID: 16948256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution.
    Tweedt DE
    Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulating eugenics.
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Apr; 121(6):1578-99. PubMed ID: 18524068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The constitutional implications of human cloning.
    Foley EP
    Ariz Law Rev; 2000; 42(3):647-730. PubMed ID: 15747441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests, government oversight, and the First Amendment: what the government can (and can't) do to protect the public's health.
    Javitt GH; Stanley E; Hudson K
    Oklahoma Law Rev; 2004; 57(2):251-302. PubMed ID: 15658034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. State Restrictions on Mifepristone Access - The Case for Federal Preemption.
    Zettler PJ; Sarpatwari A
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Feb; 386(8):705-707. PubMed ID: 35020981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selling bone marrow--Flynn v. Holder.
    Cohen IG
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Jan; 366(4):296-7. PubMed ID: 22187961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Federal genetic nondiscrimination legislation: the new "right" and the race to protect DNA at the local, state, and federal level.
    Hathaway KA
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2002; 52(1):133-77. PubMed ID: 16493794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion).
    Sunstein CR
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions.
    Vanzi LM
    N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.