These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15568646)

  • 1. Environmental monitoring: data trending using a frequency model.
    Caputo RA; Huffman A
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2004; 58(5):254-60. PubMed ID: 15568646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Charting and Evaluation of Environmental Microbial Monitoring Data.
    Bar R
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(6):743-61. PubMed ID: 26659105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of environmental monitoring methods and levels.
    Noble NH
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1993; 47(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 8445496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical analysis of environmental monitoring data: does a worst case time for monitoring clean rooms exist?
    Cundell AM; Bean R; Massimore L; Maier C
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1998; 52(6):326-30. PubMed ID: 10050131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of commercially available contact plates for monitoring microbial environments.
    Pinto F; Hiom S; Girdlestone S; Maillard JY
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 48(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 19187502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigational trends: clean room environmental monitoring.
    Tetzlaff RF
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1992; 46(6):206-14. PubMed ID: 1474432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the BioVigilant IMD-A, a novel optical spectroscopy technology for the continuous and real-time environmental monitoring of viable and nonviable particles. Part II. Case studies in environmental monitoring during aseptic filling, intervention assessments, and glove integrity testing in manufacturing isolators.
    Miller MJ; Walsh MR; Shrake JL; Dukes RE; Hill DB
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(3):259-83. PubMed ID: 20069799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The expanded application of most probable number to the quantitative evaluation of extremely low microbial count.
    Sun X; Kurosu S; Shintani H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2006; 60(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 16696195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement in day zero recoveries in field soil dissipation studies using larger diameter soil samples.
    Sharma AK; Strek HJ; Barefoot AC
    J Agric Food Chem; 2014 May; 62(18):4090-4. PubMed ID: 24735103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental monitoring: data trending using a frequency model.
    Caputo RA
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2006; 60(3):137. PubMed ID: 17089681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring of microbial metal transformations in the environment.
    Wiatrowski HA; Barkay T
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2005 Jun; 16(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15961026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The index of microbial air contamination.
    Pasquarella C; Pitzurra O; Savino A
    J Hosp Infect; 2000 Dec; 46(4):241-56. PubMed ID: 11170755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbial identification strategies in the pharmaceutical industry.
    Cundell AM
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2006; 60(2):111-23. PubMed ID: 16696194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aerial monitoring of marine waterfowl in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea.
    Johnson SR; Noel LE; Gazey WJ; Hawkes VC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Sep; 108(1-3):1-43. PubMed ID: 16160776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monitoring minimization of grade B environments based on risk assessment using three-dimensional airflow measurements and computer simulation.
    Katayama H; Higo T; Tokunaga Y; Katoh S; Hiyama Y; Morikawa K
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(4):244-55. PubMed ID: 19174953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of statistical process control charts to monitor changes in animal production systems.
    De Vries A; Reneau JK
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(13 Suppl):E11-24. PubMed ID: 20081080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the stress response to monitor process control: pathways to more effective bioremediation.
    Hazen TC; Stahl DA
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2006 Jun; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 16616486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical Method for Trending of Excursions in Clean Room Microbiological Monitoring Data.
    Gurijala KR; Barnett A
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2021; 75(5):407-424. PubMed ID: 33608470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of imputation methods for microbial surface water quality studies.
    Nieh C; Dorevitch S; Liu LC; Jones RM
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May; 16(5):1145-53. PubMed ID: 24705739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.